ArticleOdontology2019
Association between number of pairs of opposing posterior teeth, metabolic syndrome, and obesity.
Article in Odontology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of tooth loss with circadian syndrome in US adults: the mediated role of systemic inflammation.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Association of tooth location, occlusal support and chewing ability with cognitive decline and incident dementia.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
- Increased Waist Circumference after One-Year Is Associated with Poor Chewing Status.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- The Risk of Cardiovascular Disease According to Chewing Status Could Be Modulated by Healthy Diet in Middle-Aged Koreans.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Evaluation of occlusal status of Japanese adults based on functional tooth units.International dental journal · 2022Article
- Association of Loss of Occlusal Pairs of Teeth with Sarcopenia in a Chinese Population of Community-Dwelling Elderly.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Lower Masticatory Performance Is a Risk for the Development of the Metabolic Syndrome: The Suita Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the relationship between the number of pairs of posterior teeth and metabolic syndrome (MetS), abdominal obesity (AO), and obesity, among Japanese adults. In 2005, 2,807 Japanese adults aged 25-74 years participated in the Survey of Dental Diseases and the National Health and Nutrition Survey. Based on the survey data, BMI, AO (JAS) determined by the Japan Atherosclerosis Society, AO (IDF) by the International Diabetes Federation, and MetS were assessed. Total functional tooth units (t-FTUs) were scored with pairs of opposing posterior teeth, including artificial teeth. Subjects were divided into three categories of chewing ability based on the score of t-FTUs: Poor (if score ≤ 9), Good (if score = 10-11), and Complete (if score = 12). The relationships between chewing ability and BMI ≥ 25, BMI ≥ 30, AO (JAS), AO (IDF), and MetS were tested using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The chewing ability was significantly associated with MetS, AO, and obesity in the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Adjusted OR of "Poor" compared to "Complete" were 1.51 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-1.84) for BMI ≥ 25, 2.10 (95% CI 1.40-3.14) for BMI ≥ 30, 1.31 (95% CI 1.07-1.61) for AO (JAS), 1.40 (95% CI 1.15-1.70) for AO (IDF), and 1.34 (95% CI 1.04-1.72) for MetS. All were statistically significant. Preventing tooth loss and maintaining pairs of good chewing ability may be important factors in preventing MetS, AO, and obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.