Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30218214›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2019

Automatic Removal of False Connections in Diffusion MRI Tractography Using Topology-Informed Pruning (TIP).

Fang-Cheng Yeh, Sandip Panesar, Jessica Barrios, David Fernandes, Kumar Abhinav, Antonio Meola, Juan C Fernandez-Miranda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reduced Effect ofNeurology. Genetics · 2026
    Article
  10. Creativity: a (white) matter of connectivity.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fang-Cheng YehDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. frank.yeh@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7946-2173
Sandip PanesarDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jessica BarriosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David FernandesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kumar AbhinavDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Antonio MeolaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Juan C Fernandez-MirandaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USStanford University · US

Funding

Language connectivity pathways and neuroplasticity in aphasic stroke patientsR01DC013803 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FERNANDEZ-MIRANDA, JUAN CARLOS, HULA, WILLIAM D. · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Construction of a high-resolution human tractography atlas and its related toolboxR56MH113634 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI YEH, FANG-CHENG · 2018 to 2018
$452k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013803NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC013803NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH113634Pittsburgh Foundation Copeland Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion MRI fiber tracking provides a non-invasive method for mapping the trajectories of human brain connections, but its false connection problem has been a major challenge. This study introduces topology-informed pruning (TIP), a method that automatically identifies singular tracts and eliminates them to improve the tracking accuracy. The accuracy of the tractography with and without TIP was evaluated by a team of 6 neuroanatomists in a blinded setting to examine whether TIP could improve the accuracy. The results showed that TIP improved the tracking accuracy by 11.93% in the single-shell scheme and by 3.47% in the grid scheme. The improvement is significantly different from a random pruning (p value < 0.001). The diagnostic agreement between TIP and neuroanatomists was comparable to the agreement between neuroanatomists. The proposed TIP algorithm can be used to automatically clean-up noisy fibers in deterministic tractography, with a potential to confirm the existence of a fiber connection in basic neuroanatomical studies or clinical neurosurgical planning.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedNeuroimagingDeterministic fiber trackingDiffusion MRIStructural connectomeTopologyTractography

Identifiers

PMID30218214
PMCPMC6361061
OpenAlexW2891995230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.