ReviewInternational orthopaedics2019
Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Early follow-up study on three-dimensional-printed customized porous acetabular components for reconstructing extensive acetabular bone defects in primary total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Satisfactory long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes using supercritical COEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- 3D-printed Personalized Porous Acetabular Component to Reconstruct Extensive Acetabular Bone Defects in Primary Hip Arthroplasty.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF USING VARIOUS GRAIN ALLOGRAFT SIZES IN PAPROSKY TYPE 3.Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2024Article
- Reinforcement Ring-Augmented Hip Arthroplasty: A 35-Year Follow-up.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring with a Metal Augment: A Minimum Eight-Year Follow-Up Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Long-term functional results of revision hip replacement using Burch-Schneider cages.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Major acetabular defects: outcomes of first revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull cross-plate with allograft and cemented dual mobility cup at a maximum follow-up of fourteen years.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Comparative Study with and without the Use of 3D Prototyping of an Unconventional Technique in the Surgical Planning of Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2022Article
- Revision of a Failed Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty following Excessive Reaming with a Medial Cup Protrusion.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Pelvic discontinuity: a challenge to overcome.EFORT open reviews · 2021Review
- Severe osteolysis and periprosthetic femoral fracture 45 years after acrylic hemiarthroplasty of the hip: a case report.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Clinical study of outcomes after revision surgery using porous titanium custom-made implants for severe acetabular septic bone defects.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.Expert review of medical devices · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acetabular revisions with severe bone defects can be challenging procedures. Several grading systems have been set into place to help the surgeon adequately gauge the degree of bone loss within the acetabulum. Internationally innovative research in orthopedics and bio-engineering has helped with progression of successful techniques and rings to re-establish the normal anatomy of the hip. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the outcomes of the different acetabular reinforcement rings in the setting of severe acetabular defects. A successive report of relevant data from the literature of multiple techniques will be provided. The procedures include the cup-cage, the Müller ring, the Ganz Ring, the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device (KARD), the graft augmentation prosthesis (GAP) ring, and the Burch-Schneider ring. The main focus of this overview is rings only; other devices such as trabecular augments, custom-made cages, or oblong cups are not discussed. Furthermore, a special emphasis on the surgical technique of the KARD is also given. Procedures using these rings are usually associated with bone grafts either bulk or morselized. When considering the available data on these various rings used for reconstruction of the severely damaged acetabulum, the cup-cage, the KARD, and the Burch-Schneider ring appear to be reliable options for more successful long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.