ArticleLung2018
Free Desmosine is a Sensitive Marker of Smoke-Induced Emphysema.
Article in Lung, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers of pulmonary fibrosis in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and saliva. Study methods and pathophysiological significance.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Blood-based Transcriptomic and Proteomic Biomarkers of Emphysema.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Animal Models Reflecting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Related Respiratory Disorders: Translating Pre-Clinical Data into Clinical Relevance.Journal of innate immunity · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile the elastin-specific crosslinks, desmosine and isodesmosine (DID), are increased in blood, urine, and sputum of patients with clinically documented pulmonary emphysema, the usefulness of DID in detecting early lung injury remains untested. To this end, our laboratory has measured DID in a hamster model of smoke-induced emphysema, involving only minimal alveolar wall damage.
methodsAnimals were either treated with cigarette smoke for 2 h/day, 5 days/week, or exposed only to room air (controls) for a period of 3 months. DID levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and whole lungs were determined at monthly intervals, using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Lung surface area was also determined, as a measure of airspace enlargement.
resultsThe portion of BALF DID not bound to peptides (free DID) was significantly higher in smoke-exposed animals at 2 months (9.2 vs 4.4 pg/mg protein; p < 0.05), whereas total BALF DID showed no significant increases over the course of the study, and total lung DID remained unchanged. There was a mild, but significant, loss of lung surface area in the smoke-exposed group at 2 months (28.8% vs 25.2%, p < 0.05), which showed no further progression, consistent with the return of free DID to control levels at 3 months.
conclusionsThese findings support the hypothesis that free DID are sensitive indicators of smoke-induced lung injury. Measurement of free DID in smokers with minimally decreased lung mass may help determine the utility of this parameter as a test for incipient pulmonary emphysema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30218154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.