ArticleScientific reports2018
Evaluation of two-point Dixon water-fat separation for liver specific contrast-enhanced assessment of liver maximum capacity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Water-Specific and Fat-Specific T1 and Fat Fraction Mapping of the Abdomen in Free Breathing Conditions With a Radially Encoded MP2RAGE.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- MRI management of focal liver lesions: what a beginner cannot fail to know.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Influence of Gadoxetate disodium to the hepatic proton density fat fraction quantified with the Dixon sequences in a rabbit model.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Water-Fat Separated T1 Mapping in the Liver and Correlation to Hepatic Fat Fraction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- Intensity non-uniformity correction in MR imaging using residual cycle generative adversarial network.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging has become a useful tool for quantitative evaluation of liver capacity. We report on the importance of intrahepatic fat on gadoxetic acid-supported T1 mapping for estimation of liver maximum capacity, assessed by the realtime
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.