Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30217993›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Differences in the intrinsic chondrogenic potential of equine umbilical cord matrix and cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for cartilage regeneration.

Rodolphe Rakic, Bastien Bourdon, Magali Demoor, Stéphane Maddens, Nathalie Saulnier, Philippe Galéra

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Peptide Regulation of Chondrogenic Stem Cell Differentiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodolphe RakicNormandie Univ, Unicaen, Biotargen, Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
Bastien BourdonNormandie Univ, Unicaen, Biotargen, Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
Magali DemoorNormandie Univ, Unicaen, Biotargen, Caen, 14000 Caen, France.
Stéphane MaddensVetbiobank, 69280, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Nathalie SaulnierVetbiobank, 69280, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Philippe GaléraNormandie Univ, Unicaen, Biotargen, Caen, 14000 Caen, France. philippe.galera@unicaen.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7797-2284
Normandie Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (UCB-MSCs) and umbilical cord matrix MSCs (UCM-MSCs) have chondrogenic potential and are alternative sources to standard surgically derived bone marrow or adipose tissue collection for cartilage engineering. However, the majority of comparative studies explore neonatal MSCs potential only on ISCT benchmark assays accounting for some bias in the reproducibility between in vitro and in clinical studies. Therefore, we characterized equine UCB-MSCs and UCM-MSCs and investigated with particular attention their chondrogenesis potential in 3D culture with BMP-2 + TGF-ß1 in normoxia or hypoxia. We carried out an exhaustive characterization of the extracellular matrix generated by both these two types of MSCs after the induction of chondrogenesis through evaluation of hyaline cartilage, hypertrophic and osteogenic markers (mRNA, protein and histology levels). Some differences in hypoxia sensitivity and chondrogenesis were observed. UCB-MSCs differentiated into chondrocytes express an abundant, dense and a hyaline-like cartilage matrix. By contrast, despite their expression of cartilage markers, UCM-MSCs failed to express a relevant cartilage matrix after chondrogenic induction. Both MSCs types also displayed intrinsic differences at their undifferentiated basal status, UCB-MSCs expressing higher levels of chondrogenic markers whereas UCM-MSCs synthesizing higher amounts of osteogenic markers. Our results suggest that UCB-MSCs should be preferred for ex-vivo horse cartilage engineering. How those results should be translated to in vivo direct cartilage regeneration remains to be determined through dedicated study.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2CartilageCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChondrocytesChondrogenesisCollagen Type IExtracellular MatrixFetal BloodHorsesHyaline CartilageMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisRegenerationReproducibility of ResultsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Collagen Type ITransforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID30217993
PMCPMC6138671
OpenAlexW2891082241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.