Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30217235›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Acceptability to patients, carers and clinicians of an mHealth platform for the management of Parkinson's disease (PD_Manager): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Angelo Antonini, Giovanni Gentile, Manuela Giglio, Andrea Marcante, Heather Gage, Morro M L Touray, Dimitrios I Fotiadis, Dimitris Gatsios, Spyridon Konitsiotis, Lada Timotijevic and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07262593 (Family-Based Meal Timing for Cancer Prevention Among Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07262593 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Family-Based Meal Timing for Cancer Prevention Among Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders: FAMTIME

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2024 to 2024Enrolled2ConditionsCancer PreventionArmsTime Restricted Eating (TRE), Medically Tailored Meals (MTM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Angelo AntoniniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni GentileIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Manuela GiglioIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Andrea MarcanteDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Heather GageSurrey Health Economics Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Morro M L TouraySurrey Health Economics Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK. m.touray@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1509-6194
Dimitrios I FotiadisDepartment of Materials Science, Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Dimitris GatsiosDepartment of Materials Science, Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Spyridon KonitsiotisDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Lada TimotijevicDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
Bernadette EganDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
Charo HodgkinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
Roberta BiundoIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
Clelia PellicanoFondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Via Ardeatina 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
PD_Manager consortium
University of Surrey · GBIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITUniversity of Ioannina · GRUniversity of Padua · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

European Commission 643706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParkinson's disease is a degenerative neurological condition causing multiple motor and non-motor symptoms that have a serious adverse effect on quality of life. Management is problematic due to the variable and fluctuating nature of symptoms, often hourly and daily. The PD_Manager mHealth platform aims to provide a continuous feed of data on symptoms to improve clinical understanding of the status of any individual patient and inform care planning. The objectives of this trial are to (1) assess patient (and family carer) perspectives of PD_Manager regarding comfort, acceptability and ease of use; (2) assess clinician views about the utility of the data generated by PD_Manager for clinical decision making and the acceptability of the system in clinical practice. METHODS/

designThis trial is an unblinded, parallel, two-group, randomised controlled pilot study. A total of 200 persons with Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage 3, experiencing motor fluctuations at least 2 h per day), with primary family carers, in three countries (110 Rome, 50 Venice, Italy; 20 each in Ioannina, Greece and Surrey, England) will be recruited. Following informed consent, baseline information will be gathered, including the following: age, gender, education, attitudes to technology (patient and carer); time since Parkinson's diagnosis, symptom status and comorbidities (patient only). Randomisation will assign participants (1:1 in each country), to PD_Manager vs control, stratifying by age (1 ≤ 70 : 1 > 70) and gender (60% M: 40% F). The PD_Manager system captures continuous data on motor symptoms, sleep, activity, speech quality and emotional state using wearable devices (wristband, insoles) and a smartphone (with apps) for storing and transmitting the information. Control group participants will be asked to keep a symptom diary covering the same elements as PD_Manager records. After a minimum of two weeks, each participant will attend a consultation with a specialist doctor for review of the data gathered (by either means), and changes to management will be initiated as indicated. Patients, carers and clinicians will be asked for feedback on the acceptability and utility of the data collection methods. The PD_Manager intervention, compared to a symptom diary, will be evaluated in a cost-consequences framework. DISCUSSION: Information gathered will inform further development of the PD_Manager system and a larger effectiveness trial.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN17396879 . Registered on 15 March 2017.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedCaregiversClinical Decision-MakingDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicParkinson DiseasePatient Care TeamPhysiciansPilot ProjectsAcceptabilityCost consequence analysismHealthParkinson’s diseaseUtility

Identifiers

PMID30217235
PMCPMC6138904
OpenAlexW2887728410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.