Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30217204›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT) adapted for use in adult patients: report from an initial validation study.

Alina Skrzypek-Salamon, Anna Lis-Święty, Irmina Ranosz-Janicka, Ligia Brzezińska-Wcisło

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04922736 (Patient Reported Outcomes With UVA-1 Therapy for Treatment of Sclerosing Skin Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04922736 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Patient Reported Outcomes With UVA-1 Therapy for Treatment of Sclerosing Skin Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2021 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsScleroderma, Systemic, Morphea, Graft Vs Host DiseaseArmsUVA-1 Phototherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Comparative study between fractional COArchives of dermatological research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent Advances in Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis and Morphea.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alina Skrzypek-SalamonDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Francuska Str. 20/24, 40-027, Katowice, Poland. skrzypekalina@interia.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-8539
Anna Lis-ŚwiętyDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Francuska Str. 20/24, 40-027, Katowice, Poland.
Irmina Ranosz-JanickaDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Francuska Str. 20/24, 40-027, Katowice, Poland.
Ligia Brzezińska-WcisłoDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Francuska Str. 20/24, 40-027, Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny KNW-1-086/K/7/K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocalized scleroderma (LoS) affects both children and adults and is associated with permanent functional and cosmetic impairment, and reduced quality of life predominating in adults. The Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT) is a clinical instrument designed to measure an activity and damage of LoS. It has been validated for use with pediatric LoS patients. This study assessed the validity and reliability of the LoSCAT adapted for use in adults.

methodsBefore the initiation of the study two examiners participated in an intensive training course carried out by an expert in LoS. Appendices describing each LoSCAT domain were prepared. Features determining disease activity and damage in adult LoS patients were identified to properly evaluate the physician (Phys) and patient (Pt) global assessment (GA) of disease activity (A)/severity (S) and damage (D), which were used to assess convergent validity of the LoSCAT. Correlations of physician- and patient-derivied measures with Skindex-29 were also analysed.

resultsThe study included 40 adult LoS patients (33 females and 7 males) with different subtypes of LoS. Intra and inter-rater reliability of the LoSCAT was found to be excellent. Positive correlations were observed between the PhysGA-A, PhysGA-D, PtGA-A and the LoSCAT's domains, while no correlations between them and the PtGA-D were found. There were no relationships between LoSCAT's components and Skindex-29.

conclusionsDespite the LoSCAT is a reliable tool for an assessment of cutaneous lesions, additional health status instruments are necessary to a holistic approach to LoS in adults.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsScleroderma, LocalizedAdult-onset morpheaOutcome measureQuality of lifeSkin score

Identifiers

PMID30217204
PMCPMC6137731
OpenAlexW2890094798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.