Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30217174›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2018

Anticholinergic burden and comorbidities in patients attending treatment with trospium chloride for overactive bladder in a real-life setting: results of a prospective non-interventional study.

A Ivchenko, R-H Bödeker, C Neumeister, A Wiedemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A IvchenkoDepartment of Urology, Evangelisches KrankenhausWitten gGmbH, UniversityWitten/Herdecke, Pferdebachstrasse 27, 58455, Witten, Germany.
R-H BödekerDepartment of Statistics, Institute of Medical Informatics, University Clinic Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 6, 35392, Gießen, Germany.
C NeumeisterDepartment of Medical Science/Clinical Research, Dr. R. Pfleger GmbH, Dr.-Robert-Pfleger-Strasse 12, 96052, Bamberg, Germany. claudia.neumeister@dr-pfleger.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-5003
A WiedemannDepartment of Urology, Evangelisches KrankenhausWitten gGmbH, UniversityWitten/Herdecke, Pferdebachstrasse 27, 58455, Witten, Germany.
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg · DEDr. Pfleger Arzneimittel (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly people are representative for the patients most likely to be treated with anticholinergics for overactive bladder (OAB). They often receive further drugs with anticholinergic properties for concomitant conditions. This increases the risk for side effects, including central nervous system disorders. Data on comorbidities and baseline anticholinergic burden of OAB patients seen in urological practice is scarce. Therefore, we included an epidemiological survey on these issues in our study which assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of trospium chloride (TC) in established dosages under routine conditions.

methodsOutpatients (≥ 65 years of age), for whom treatment with TC was indicated, were eligible to participate in this non-interventional, prospective study performed in 162 urological practices in Germany. Epidemiological questions were evaluated by the Anticholinergic Burden (ACB) scale and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G) at baseline. Efficacy was assessed by changes in symptom-related variables of OAB after treatment. Dosage regimen, duration of treatment, adverse events, withdrawals, and ease of subdivision of the prescribed SNAP-TAB tablet were documented. Patients and physicians rated efficacy and tolerability of treatment. Statistics were descriptive.

resultsFour hundred fourty-five out of 986 (47.54%) patients in the epidemiological population had a baseline ACB scale score > 0, 100 (24.72%) of whom a score ≥ 3. The median CIRS-G comorbidity index score for all patients was 5. 78.55% (608/774) of patients in the efficacy population received a daily dose of 45 mg TC. 60.03% (365/608) of them took this dose by dividing the SNAP-TAB tablet in three equal parts. Before-after-comparisons of the core symptoms of OAB showed clear improvements. An influence of the dosage scheme (1 × 45 mg TC/d vs 3 × 15 mg TC/d) on clinical outcome could not be observed. Most urologists and patients rated TC treatment as effective and well tolerated. 44 (4.37%) out of 1007 patients in the safety collective ended their treatment prematurely, while 75 patients (7.45%) experienced adverse events.

conclusionsAnticholinergic burden and comorbidities in elderly OAB patients are frequent. The acceptance of the SNAP-TAB tablet, which facilitates flexible dosing with TC, was high, which is supportive in ensuring adherence in therapy.

trial registrationThis non-interventional study was registered on October 29, 2014 with the number DRKS00007109 at the German Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS).

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overBenzilatesComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsNortropanesPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesTabletsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrological AgentsBenzilatesMuscarinic AntagonistsNortropanesTabletstrospium chlorideUrological AgentsAnticholinergic burdenCIRS-GComorbidity indexElderly patientsNon-interventional studyOveractive bladderTrospium chloride

Identifiers

PMID30217174
PMCPMC6137886
OpenAlexW2891790020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.