Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30217151›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Differences in healthcare costs in youths with conduct disorders in rural vs. urban regions: an analysis of German health insurance data.

Heike Gerhardt, Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Christian J Bachmann

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Maintaining a comprehensive provision of inpatient child and adolescent mental health services in the years to come-a German perspective].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heike GerhardtDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Philipps-University Marburg, Hans-Sachs-Str. 4-6, DE-35039, Marburg, Germany.
Monika Heinzel-GutenbrunnerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Philipps-University Marburg, Hans-Sachs-Str. 4-6, DE-35039, Marburg, Germany.
Christian J BachmannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Philipps-University Marburg, Hans-Sachs-Str. 4-6, DE-35039, Marburg, Germany. christian.bachmann@lvr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7526-2660
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor children and adolescents with mental health problems, there is a lack of data as to whether the type of residential area (urban vs. rural) influences healthcare costs for affected individuals. The aim of this study was therefore to explore potential urban vs. rural healthcare cost differences in children and adolescents with conduct disorder (CD), one of the most frequent and cost-intensive child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Additionally, we aimed to compare healthcare costs of youths with CD, and of youths without this diagnosis.

methodsWe analysed data from a German health insurance company, extracting all youths with a CD diagnosis in 2011 (CD group; N = 6337), and an age- and sex-matched group without this diagnosis (control group). For both groups, annual costs per person for outpatient and inpatient healthcare were aggregated, stratified by area of residence (urban vs. rural).

resultsWhile mean annual overall costs in the CD group did not differ significantly between urban and rural areas of residence (2785 EUR vs. 3557 EUR, p = 0.253), inpatient treatment costs were significantly higher in rural areas (2166 EUR (60.9% of overall costs) vs. 1199 EUR (43.1% of overall costs), p < 0.0005). For outpatient healthcare costs, the reverse effect was found, with significantly higher costs in individuals from urban areas of residence (901 EUR (32.3% of overall costs) vs. 581 EUR (16.3% of overall costs), p < 0.0005). In the control group, no significant rural vs. urban difference was found for either overall health costs, inpatient or outpatient costs. Mean overall costs in the CD group were four times higher than in the control group (3162 (±5934) EUR vs. 795 (±4425) EUR).

conclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate urban vs. rural differences in healthcare costs among youths with CD. The higher costs of inpatient treatment in rural regions may indicate a need for alternative forms of service provision and delivery in rural settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolConduct DisorderDelivery of Health CareFemaleGermanyHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansInsurance, HealthMaleRural HealthUrban HealthAdolescentsChildrenConduct disorderCost analysisGermanyHealth insurance companyHealth services utilisationRuralSecondary dataUrban

Identifiers

PMID30217151
PMCPMC6137893
OpenAlexW2891174492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.