ArticleTranslational oncology2018
Clinical Relevance of Genomic Changes in Recurrent Pediatric Solid Tumors.
Article in Translational oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Detection of Segmental Chromosomal Aberrations in Neuroblastoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Promising survival rate but high incidence of treatment-related mortality after reduced-dose craniospinal radiotherapy and tandem high-dose chemotherapy in patients with high-risk medulloblastoma.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Intratumor heterogeneity inferred from targeted deep sequencing as a prognostic indicator.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Discovery of actionable genetic alterations with targeted panel sequencing in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRelapsed/refractory pediatric cancers show poor prognosis; however, their genomic patterns remain unknown. To investigate the genetic mechanisms of tumor relapse and therapy resistance, we characterized genomic alterations in diagnostic and relapsed lesions in patients with relapsed/refractory pediatric solid tumors using targeted deep sequencing. PATIENTS AND
methodsA targeted sequencing panel covering the exons of 381 cancer genes was used to characterize 19 paired diagnostic and relapsed samples from patients with relapsed/refractory pediatric solid tumors.
resultsThe mean coverage for all samples was 930.6× (SD = 213.8). Among the 381 genes, 173 single nucleotide variations (SNVs)/insertion-deletions (InDels), 100 copy number alterations, and 1 structural variation were detected. A total of 72.6% of SNVs in primary tumors were also found in recurrent lesions, and 27.2% of SNVs in recurrent tumors had newly occurred. Among SNVs/InDels detected only in recurrent lesions, 71% had a low variant allele fraction (<10%). Patients were classified into three categories based on the mutation patterns after cancer treatment. A significant association between the major mutation patterns and clinical outcome was observed. Patients whose relapsed tumor had fewer mutations than the diagnostic sample tended to be older, had longer progression-free survival, and achieved complete remission after relapse. Contrastingly, patients whose genetic profile only had concordant mutations without any change had the worst outcome.
conclusionsWe characterized genomic changes in recurrent pediatric solid tumors. These findings could help to understand the biology of relapsed childhood cancer and to develop personalized treatment based on their genetic profile.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.