ArticleCritical care medicine2018
SEP-1: The Lactate Myth and Other Fairytales.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of noradrenaline compared to adrenaline in the management of septic shock.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025Review
- Compliance with SEP-1 guidelines is associated with improved outcomes for septic shock but not for severe sepsis.Journal of intensive medicine · 2022Article
- RegardingJournal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Article
- Driving blind: instituting SEP-1 without high quality outcomes data.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Lactate guided resuscitation-nothing is more dangerous than conscientious foolishness.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30216302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.