Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30216275›Full record

ArticleSimulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare2019

In Situ Simulation to Mitigate Threats to Participation in a Multicenter Clinical Trial in High-Acuity, Low-Frequency Setting.

Steven Chan, Lynn Babcock, Gary Geis, Mary Frey, Venita Robinson, Benjamin Kerrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Community-based in situ simulation: bringing simulation to the masses.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven ChanFrom the Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine (S.C., L.B., G.G., M.F., B.K.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati; and Quality Improvement Services (V.R.), Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Lynn Babcock
Gary Geis
Mary Frey
Venita Robinson
Benjamin Kerrey

Funding

Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT)U01NS088034 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI CHAMBERLAIN, JAMES, KAPUR, JAIDEEP · 2014 to 2018
$16.3M
Neurosteroid Regulation of SeizuresR01NS044370 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI KAPUR, JAIDEEP · 2003 to 2017
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044370NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS088034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMulticenter clinical trials of high-acuity, low-frequency emergencies are expensive and resource intensive. Current standards for trial preparation have significant limitations. Our objective is to describe our use of in situ simulation (ISS) to identify and mitigate threats to enrollment, protocol adherence, and patient safety in preparation for a multicenter clinical trial of antiepileptics for status epilepticus in the emergency department.

methodsThis is a descriptive study of ISS conducted in the emergency department at a free-standing, academic pediatric institution. We designed two scenarios, one for an eligible and ineligible patient, to allow care teams to complete all study procedures. All study training was completed before the first ISS. Participants included physicians, nurses, patient care assistants, paramedics, research coordinators, and pharmacists. Ten-minute simulations were followed by 10-minute debriefings, led by trained facilitators using a standard template. Data on threats to enrollment, protocol adherence, and patient safety were recorded. Mitigation strategies were developed by the study team and local experts in ISS.

resultsTen of 18 planned simulations were conducted. Seven of 10 completed simulations were study eligible patients, with 73 total participants. Nine threats to enrollment and five to protocol adherence were identified. Five of 14 were also threats to patient safety. Mitigation strategies included creation of decision aid tools, targeted education during debriefings, adapting study material for use, and revision of status epilepticus treatment algorithm.

conclusionsThe addition of ISS to standard preparation for a multicenter clinical trial facilitated the identification and mitigation of threats to study participation and patient safety.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitals, PediatricPatient Care TeamPatient SafetySimulation TrainingAnticonvulsantsClinical CompetenceClinical ProtocolsClinical Trial Protocols as TopicGuideline AdherenceHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodStatus EpilepticusAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID30216275
PMCPMC6358461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.