Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30215343›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology spectrum2018

Functional Transcriptomics for Bacterial Gene Detectives.

Blanca M Perez-Sepulveda, Jay C D Hinton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology spectrum, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. microLife · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Blanca M Perez-SepulvedaInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jay C D HintonInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106914/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developments in transcriptomic technology and the availability of whole-genome-level expression profiles for many bacterial model organisms have accelerated the assignment of gene function. However, the deluge of transcriptomic data is making the analysis of gene expression a challenging task for biologists. Online resources for global bacterial gene expression analysis are not available for the majority of published data sets, impeding access and hindering data exploration. Here, we show the value of preexisting transcriptomic data sets for hypothesis generation. We describe the use of accessible online resources, such as SalComMac and SalComRegulon, to visualize and analyze expression profiles of coding genes and small RNAs. This approach arms a new generation of "gene detectives" with powerful new tools for understanding the transcriptional networks of

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, BacterialIronOnline SystemsOsmotic PressureOxidative StressSalmonellaStress, PsychologicalTranscriptomeIron

Identifiers

PMID30215343
PMCPMC11633634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.