Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30215167›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2019

Automated Neuron Detection in High-Content Fluorescence Microscopy Images Using Machine Learning.

Gadea Mata, Miroslav Radojević, Carlos Fernandez-Lozano, Ihor Smal, Niels Werij, Miguel Morales, Erik Meijering, Julio Rubio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sensitivity-Enhancing Strategies in Optical Biosensing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gadea Mata *Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain. gadea.mata@unirioja.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5567-8463
Miroslav Radojević *Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Carlos Fernandez-Lozano *Department of Computer Science, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Ihor SmalBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Niels WerijBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Miguel MoralesMolecular Cognition Laboratory, Biophysics Institute, CSIC-UPV/EHU, Campus Universidad del País Vasco, Leioa, Spain.
Erik MeijeringBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Departments of Medical Informatics and Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Julio RubioDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversidad de La Rioja · ESUniversidade da Coruña · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

European Regional Development Fund () 612.001.018Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad UNLC13-13-3503Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (ES) FJCI-2015-26071Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (ES) MTM2014-54151-PMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (ES) UNLC08-1E-002Universidad de La Rioja FPI-UR-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of neuronal morphology in relation to function, and the development of effective medicines to positively impact this relationship in patients suffering from neurodegenerative diseases, increasingly involves image-based high-content screening and analysis. The first critical step toward fully automated high-content image analyses in such studies is to detect all neuronal cells and distinguish them from possible non-neuronal cells or artifacts in the images. Here we investigate the performance of well-established machine learning techniques for this purpose. These include support vector machines, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, and generalized linear model classifiers, operating on an extensive set of image features extracted using the compound hierarchy of algorithms representing morphology, and the scale-invariant feature transform. We present experiments on a dataset of rat hippocampal neurons from our own studies to find the most suitable classifier(s) and subset(s) of features in the common practical setting where there is very limited annotated data for training. The results indicate that a random forests classifier using the right feature subset ranks best for the considered task, although its performance is not statistically significantly better than some support vector machine based classification models.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningNeuronsAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, FluorescenceRatsFluorescence microscopyHigh-content analysisMachine learningNeuron detection

Identifiers

PMID30215167
OpenAlexW2891516156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.