Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30215115›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2019

Secular trends of hip fractures in France: impact of changing characteristics of the background population.

R Garofoli, M Maravic, A Ostertag, M Cohen-Solal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Hospitalizations for major osteoporotic fractures in Switzerland: a long-term trend analysis between 1998 and 2018.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R GarofoliRheumatology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
M MaravicRheumatology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
A OstertagINSERM U1132, Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7, Hôpital Lariboisière (APHP), Paris, France.
M Cohen-SolalRheumatology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France. martine.cohen-solal@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-8258
Inserm · FRHôpital Lariboisière · FRIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHip fractures are a societal burden because of their high morbidity and mortality and the cost they generate. With the aging of the population, worries grow about an increase of the incidence and incidence rate of hip fracture in the future. Controversial data have been provided in relation to the referencepopulation used. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the choice of the reference population in the incidence rate of hip fracture.

methodsData were extracted from the French National Hospital Database related to the hospitalizations for hip fracture in France between 2002 and 2013 in patients over 59 years and were classified by gender and age (59-74, 75-84, over 84 years, over 59 years). The crude incidence rates of hip fracture were calculated by dividing the number of hospitalizations for hip fracture by the corresponding populations. To assess the impact of the choice of the reference population, we then calculated the adjusted incidence rates using direct standardization on age for the 2013 reference population.

resultsFrom 2002 to 2013, the incidence of hip fracture rose by 4.8% in women (from 49,287 to 51,661) and 21.8% in men (from 12,716 to 15,482) aged over 59 years. Meanwhile, French population over 59 years increased more with a rise of 21.3% in women and 28.7% in men, resulting in a decrease in the crude incidence rates of 13.6% in women and 5.4% in men. However, this decrease was larger after direct standardization on the 2013 population of reference as 25.6% in women and 19.2% in men as a result of a difference in age-structure of the population.

conclusionsThe incidence of hip fractures continues to grow despite a reduced incidence rate throughout a 12-year-period.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionDatabases, FactualFemaleFranceHip FracturesHospitalizationHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesSex DistributionHip fractureIncidenceIncidence rateStandardization

Identifiers

PMID30215115
OpenAlexW2890033730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.