ReviewPediatric radiology2018
Current concepts and challenges in the radiologic assessment of brain tumors in children: part 2.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumour mimics in paediatric neuroimaging.Neuroradiology · 2025Review
- High-grade gliomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: analysis of imaging features and literature review.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Basics for Pediatric Brain Tumor Imaging: Techniques and Protocol Recommendations.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2024Review
- A Diagnostic Algorithm for Posterior Fossa Tumors in Children: A Validation Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021Observational
- The impact of magnetic resonance imaging spectroscopy parameters on differentiating between paediatric medulloblastoma and ependymoma.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2021Article
- Glioma surveillance imaging: current strategies, shortcomings, challenges and outlook.BJR open · 2020Review
- Comparison of volumetric and 2D-based response methods in the PNOC-001 pediatric low-grade glioma clinical trial.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Evolution and implementation of radiographic response criteria in neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing tumor response is a large part of everyday clinical work in neuroradiology. However in the setting of tumor treatment, distinguishing tumor progression from treatment-related changes is difficult on conventional MRI sequences. This is made even more challenging in children where mainstay advanced imaging techniques that are often used to decipher progression versus treatment-related changes have technical limitations. In this review, we highlight the challenges in pediatric neuro-oncologic tumor assessment with discussion of pseudophenomenon including pseudoresponse and pseudoprogression. Additionally, we discuss the advanced imaging techniques often employed in neuroradiology to distinguish between pseudophenomenon and true progressive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.