Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30215028›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2018

Multi-Tracer Guided PET Image Reconstruction.

Sam Ellis, Andrew Mallia, Colm J McGinnity, Gary J R Cook, Andrew J Reader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sam EllisSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London.
Andrew MalliaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, and the King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre.
Colm J McGinnitySchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, and the King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre.
Gary J R CookSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, and the King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre.
Andrew J ReaderSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Cancer Research UK 20265Medical Research Council G108/585Medical Research Council MR/N013042/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-tracer positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to enhance PET imaging by providing complementary information from different physiological processes. However, one or more of the images may present high levels of noise. Guided image reconstruction methods transfer information from a guide image into the PET image reconstruction to encourage edge-preserving noise reduction. In this work we aim to reduce noise in poorer quality PET datasets via guidance from higher quality ones by using a weighted quadratic penalty approach. In particular, we applied this methodology to [

Indexed as

guided reconstructionmulti-tracer PETPET image reconstructionpositron emission tomographyregularisation

Identifiers

PMID30215028
PMCPMC6130802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.