Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30215015›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2018

Cerebral blood flow changes during tilt table testing in healthy volunteers, as assessed by Doppler imaging of the carotid and vertebral arteries.

C Linda M C van Campen, Freek W A Verheugt, Frans C Visser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cerebral Blood Flow in Orthostatic Intolerance.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C Linda M C van CampenStichting CardioZorg, Planetenweg 5, 2132 HN Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Freek W A VerheugtRadboud UMC, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frans C VisserStichting CardioZorg, Planetenweg 5, 2132 HN Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUsing different techniques, reduction of cerebral blood flow (CBF) during orthostatic stress were demonstrated. One study reported flow reduction of the right internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral (VA) artery during orthostatic stress by Doppler imaging, with different effects on the 2 vessels. Global CBF changes, using this technique, have not been reported. Therefore, flow of the ICA, VA and global CBF were measured during head-up tilt testing.

methods33 healthy volunteers underwent tilt testing. At three time points (supine, half way and at the end of the test) Doppler imaging of the ICA and VA was performed, as well as PetCO2 measurements.

resultsGlobal CBF was significantly reduced by 4.5 ± 2.8% halfway the test and by 6.0 ± 3.4% at the end. All 4 artery flows were significantly reduced during the tilt, without differences between them. Despite small changes in PetCO2 there was a significant relation between de CBF decrease and PetCO2 decrease (p < 0.05).

conclusionsOrthostatic stress in HV results in a small but significant reduction of CBF by a homogenous reduction in the four cerebral vessels and is modulated by PetCO2 changes. SIGNIFICANCE: CBF changes can be measured during tilt testing using Doppler VA and ICA imaging.

Indexed as

Cerebral blood flowHead-up tilt table testHealthy volunteersInternal carotid artery blood flowPetCO2Vertebral artery blood flow

Identifiers

PMID30215015
PMCPMC6133915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.