ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2017
Visual evoked potentials after hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation in childhood.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Posterior segment complications and the risk factors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study visual pathway pathology detected by visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in childhood and to determine the impact of adverse ocular findings, somatic diseases, and conditioning regimens on the VEP results.
methodsOphthalmological assessments including pattern VEPs were performed in 47 of 79 patients at a median age of 15 years (range 3-21 years) in median 6 years (1-17 years) after HSCT. Somatic data were extracted from medical records.
resultsEight patients of 47 (17%) demonstrated pathological VEPs with prolonged latencies bilaterally (n = 3) or unilaterally (n = 5) at their latest VEP test at an age of 12-18 years. A subnormal visual acuity was present in 8/11 eyes with pathological VEPs: one eye had cataract, six eyes had cataract surgery where of two had developed secondary cataracts. One eye had residual retinopathy of prematurity. Pathological VEPs were associated with decreased visual acuity (p = 0.00019) but not linked to gender, malignant diagnosis or conditioning.
conclusionVEP recordings showed an association with decreased visual acuity but no relationship with irradiation or chemotherapy in the present study. SIGNIFICANCE: VEP recordings might be of clinical value for children with an unexplained subnormal visual acuity undergoing HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.