ArticleOncology letters2018
Texture features and pharmacokinetic parameters in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions by dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3.0 T multi-parametric MRI combined with clinical features improve malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 lesions and preoperative prediction of Nottingham Prognostic Index.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Interpretable Radiomic Signature for Breast Microcalcification Detection and Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Impact of Wavelet Kernels on Predictive Capability of Radiomic Features: A Case Study on COVID-19 Chest X-ray Images.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Radiomics derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic protocol features: the value of precision diagnosis ovarian neoplasms.European radiology · 2021Article
- Morphological Estimation of Cellularity on Neo-Adjuvant Treated Breast Cancer Histological Images.Journal of imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has become a powerful tool for the diagnosis of breast cancer in the clinical setting due to its high sensitivity and specificity. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including Ktrans and area under the curve (AUC), and texture features derived from DCE-MRI have been used to specify the characteristics inside tumors. In the present study, 56 patients (average age 45.3±11.1; range 25-69 years) with histopathologically proved breast tumors were analyzed using the pharmacokinetic parameters and texture features. Malignant tumors displayed higher Ktrans and AUC values than the benign, Ktrans exhibited a significantly difference between the malignant and benign tumors (P=0.001) compared with the AUC values (P=0.029); texture features from DCE-MRI images and pharmacokinetic parameter maps also showed a good diagnostic ability. Alongside the routine method, principal components analysis (PCA) and Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) were employed on these texture features to differentiate the breast lesions automatically. The Factor-1 scores of PCA were used to divide the patients into two groups, and the diagnosing accuracies of the FDA method on the texture features from DCE-MRI images, Ktrans maps, AUC maps were 93, 98 and 98%, with a cross validation accuracies of 82, 77 and 77%, respectively. To conclude, pharmacokinetic parameters, texture features and the combined computer-assisted classification method were discussed. All method involved in this study may be a potential assisted tool for radiological analysis on breast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.