Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214556›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Identification of RFC5 as a novel potential prognostic biomarker in lung cancer through bioinformatics analysis.

Meng Wang, Tian Xie, Yingjie Wu, Qian Yin, Songping Xie, Qingyu Yao, Jie Xiong, Qiuping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Molecular Mechanisms of Intervention With Lishukang Capsule in a Rat Model of High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meng WangDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Tian XieDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Yingjie WuDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Qian YinDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Songping XieDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, P.R. China.
Qingyu YaoDepartment of Human Resource, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China.
Jie XiongDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.
Qiuping ZhangDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortalities among all types of cancer. Therefore, the screening of biomarkers that are related with the progression of lung cancer is crucial for early diagnosis and efficient therapy of lung cancer. In the present study, bioinformatic analysis identified replication factor C 5 (RFC5) as a potential novel oncogene in lung cancer. RFC5 functions as a clamp loader and is involved in DNA replication and repair. Analysis of public databases and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction indicated that RFC5 was significantly increased in tumor tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. A high RFC5 expression was observed to be associated with more aggressive malignant clinicopathological features, including higher T stage, more advanced regional lymph node metastasis and a higher probability of relapse. Notably, there were notable differences in overall survival (OS), first progression and post-progression survival between the high RFC5 expression group and low RFC5 expression group. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that RFC5 was an independent risk factor that was associated with poorer OS and disease-free survival. According to GSEA, several gene sets that are associated with cell cycle and DNA damage were enriched in the RFC5 overexpression group, which indicated that RFC5 might promote the proliferation of lung cancer cells. Our finding indicated that RFC5 might be a novel prognostic biomarker of lung cancer, and it might be serve as a potential diagnosis and therapy target for lung cancer in the future.

Indexed as

bioinformatic analysisbiomarkerlung cancerprognosisproliferationreplication factor C 5

Identifiers

PMID30214556
PMCPMC6126192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.