Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214477›Full record

ArticleObstetric medicine2018

Visceral fat mass as a novel risk factor for predicting gestational diabetes in obese pregnant women.

J Balani, S L Hyer, H Shehata, F Mohareb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetric medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Gestational Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Glucose metabolism in gestational diabetes and their relationship with fat mass / muscle mass index.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J BalaniDepartment of Endocrinology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9634-2010
S L HyerDepartment of Endocrinology, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Surrey, UK.
H ShehataDepartment of Maternal Medicine, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Surrey, UK.
F MoharebDepartment of Bioinformatics, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a model to predict gestational diabetes mellitus incorporating classical and a novel risk factor, visceral fat mass.

methodsThree hundred two obese non-diabetic pregnant women underwent body composition analysis at booking by bioimpedance analysis. Of this cohort, 72 (24%) developed gestational diabetes mellitus. Principal component analysis was initially performed to identify possible clustering of the gestational diabetes mellitus and non-GDM groups. A machine learning algorithm was then applied to develop a GDM predictive model utilising random forest and decision tree modelling.

resultsThe predictive model was trained on 227 samples and validated using an independent testing subset of 75 samples where the model achieved a validation prediction accuracy of 77.53%. According to the decision tree developed, visceral fat mass emerged as the most important variable in determining the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.

conclusionsWe present a model incorporating visceral fat mass, which is a novel risk factor in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus in obese pregnant women.

Indexed as

Gestational diabetesmachine learningobesitypredictive modelprincipal component analysisvisceral fat mass

Identifiers

PMID30214477
PMCPMC6134351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.