Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214469›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2018

A combination of SOFA score and biomarkers gives a better prediction of septic AKI and in-hospital mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a pilot study.

Chao-Wei Lee, Hao-Wei Kou, Hong-Shiue Chou, Hsu-Huan Chou, Song-Fong Huang, Chih-Hsiang Chang, Chun-Hsing Wu, Ming-Chin Yu, Hsin-I Tsai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Sepsis Score Dilemma: Balancing Precision and Utility.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao-Wei LeeDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Hao-Wei KouDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Hong-Shiue ChouDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Hsu-Huan ChouDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Song-Fong HuangDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chih-Hsiang ChangDivision of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chun-Hsing Wu3Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Guishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Ming-Chin YuDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Hsin-I Tsai3Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Guishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a syndrome characterized by a constellation of clinical manifestations and a significantly high mortality rate in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU). It is frequently complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI), which, in turn, increases the risk of mortality. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to identify those septic patients at risk for the development of AKI and mortality. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate several different biomarkers, including NGAL, calprotectin, KIM-1, cystatin C, and GDF-15, along with SOFA scores, in predicting the development of septic AKI and associated in-hospital mortality in critically ill surgical patients. Methods: Patients admitted to the surgical ICU were prospectively enrolled, having given signed informed consent. Their blood and urine samples were obtained and subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine the levels of various novel biomarkers. The clinical data and survival outcome were recorded and analyzed. Results: A total of 33 patients were enrolled in the study. Most patients received surgery prior to ICU admission, with abdominal surgery being the most common type of procedure (27 patients (81.8%)). In the study, 22 patients had a diagnosis of sepsis with varying degrees of AKI, while the remaining 11 were free of sepsis. Statistical analysis demonstrated that in patients with septic AKI versus those without, the following were significantly higher: serum NGAL (447.5 ± 35.7 ng/mL vs. 256.5 ± 31.8 ng/mL, Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated a promising panel that allows an early diagnosis, high sensitivity, and specificity and a prognostic value for septic AKI and in-hospital mortality in surgical ICU. Further study is warranted to validate our findings.

Indexed as

Organ Dysfunction ScoresPrognosisAcute Kidney InjuryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAPACHEArea Under CurveBiomarkersCritical IllnessFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersAcute kidney injuryAKICalprotectinCritically ill patientsIntensive care unitMortalityNGALSepsisSOFA scoreSurgical ICU

Identifiers

PMID30214469
PMCPMC6131912
OpenAlexW2890371926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.