Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214359›Full record

ReviewClinical optometry2017

Contact lens wear and dry eyes: challenges and solutions.

Maria Markoulli, Sailesh Kolanu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical optometry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Repeatability of lipid layer thickness using LipiView® following removal of contact lenses and its relationship to comfort.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Eyeglasses and risk of COVID-19 transmission-analysis of the Virus Watch Community Cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tear proteomics in dry eye disease.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  18. Evaluation of CelligentDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria MarkoulliSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia, m.markoulli@unsw.edu.au.
Sailesh KolanuSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia, m.markoulli@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of contact lens wearers worldwide has remained relatively stable over the past decade, despite the investment that has gone into contact lens technology. This is largely because 10%-50% of wearers dropout of contact lens wear within 3 years of commencement; the most common reason cited being contact lens discomfort (CLD). Of the symptoms reported, sensation of dry eye is the most common. Given the outcome of reduced wearing time, increased chair time, and ultimate contact lens discontinuation, the challenge is to identify the warning signs of CLD early on. Clinically detectable changes such as conjunctival staining, conjunctival indentation, conjunctival epithelial flap formation, lid wiper epitheliopathy,

Indexed as

contact lens discomfortdry eye diseaselid wiper epitheliopathymeibomian gland dysfunctiontear film biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30214359
PMCPMC6095561
OpenAlexW2587841446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.