Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214344›Full record

ReviewClinical optometry2016

Contact lens associated microbial keratitis: practical considerations for the optometrist.

Aaron B Zimmerman, Alex D Nixon, Erin M Rueff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical optometry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03728218 (Visual Outcomes for Toric Efficacy Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03728218 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Visual Outcomes for Toric Efficacy Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HoustonRan2018 to 2020Enrolled34ConditionsAstigmatism, MyopiaArmsContact lenses (Orthokeratology), Contact lenses (Soft Multifocal)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Eye infection risks fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Impact of First Healthcare Provider onClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Microbial Adherence to Contact Lenses andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron B ZimmermanCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, zimmerman.178@osu.edu.
Alex D NixonCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, zimmerman.178@osu.edu.
Erin M RueffCollege of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, zimmerman.178@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial keratitis (MK) is a corneal condition that encompasses several different pathogens and etiologies. While contact lens associated MK is most often associated with bacterial infections, other pathogens (fungi,

Indexed as

Acanthamoebabacterial keratitiscorneal ulcerfungal keratitisFusariumPseudomonas

Identifiers

PMID30214344
PMCPMC6095396
OpenAlexW2258980507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.