Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214275›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2018

Validation study of a diagnostic scoring system for sacroiliac joint-related pain.

Juichi Tonosu, Hiroyuki Oka, Kenichi Watanabe, Hiroaki Abe, Akiro Higashikawa, Koji Yamada, Takashi Kuniya, Koji Nakajima, Sakae Tanaka, Ko Matsudaira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juichi TonosuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkaDepartment of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, okah-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Kenichi WatanabeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroaki AbeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Akiro HigashikawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Koji YamadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takashi KuniyaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Koji NakajimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sakae TanakaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, okah-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Ko MatsudairaDepartment of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, okah-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Yokohama Rosai Hospital · JPTokyo Medical University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no specific radiological findings for the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint-related pain. A diagnostic scoring system had been developed in 2017. The score comprised the sum of scores of six items. The score ranged from 0 to 9 points, and the cutoff was calculated as 4.

objectiveTo evaluate the validity of the diagnostic scoring system for sacroiliac joint-related pain. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe sacroiliac joint-related pain group (n=31) comprised patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint-related pain based on patient history, physical findings, and responses to analgesic periarticular injection. In addition, it was confirmed that they had no other lumbar or hip joint diseases. The non-sacroiliac joint-related pain group (n=123) comprised patients with low back pain due to a reason other than sacroiliac joint-related pain. We evaluated scores for all subjects. We analyzed the differences in each item between both groups and performed receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis to evaluate the score validity.

resultsThere were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. There were significant differences for the following four of six items: one-finger test results (

conclusionThe score demonstrated moderate validity for diagnosing sacroiliac joint-related pain.

Indexed as

diagnosisphysical findingssacroiliac joint-related painscoring systemvalidation

Identifiers

PMID30214275
PMCPMC6118337
OpenAlexW2888790328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.