Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214225›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018

Alternative treatment strategies to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized Phase III trials.

Hui Wang, Hefang Wang, Zhichong Yu, Honghao Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yancheng First People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224005, China, 1119159361@qq.com.
Hefang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yancheng First People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224005, China, 1119159361@qq.com.
Zhichong YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yancheng First People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224005, China, 1119159361@qq.com.
Honghao LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yancheng First People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224005, China, 1119159361@qq.com.
Nantong University · CNYancheng First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety in patients treated with sorafenib vs other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsElectronic databases were systematically reviewed for randomized Phase III trials comparing sorafenib with other TKIs or SIRT in advanced HCC. Sorafenib was defined as the control arm. Other TKIs or SIRT was defined as the experimental arm. Overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), disease-control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were reviewed. Four trials in the other-TKI group (n=4,218) and two in the SIRT group (n=819) were eligible.

resultsCompared with sorafenib, other TKIs showed similar benefit on OS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93-1.24;

conclusionPatients with locally advanced HCC treated with SIRT got similar efficacy with less toxicity to those treated with sorafenib.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomameta-analysisselective internal radiotherapysorafenibtyrosine-kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30214225
PMCPMC6118246
OpenAlexW2888492909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.