Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214204›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2018

Natural product-based nanomedicines for wound healing purposes: therapeutic targets and drug delivery systems.

Marziyeh Hajialyani, Devesh Tewari, Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez, Seyed Mohammad Nabavi, Mohammad Hosein Farzaei, Mohammad Abdollahi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Anti-ageing activities of nanovesicles derived fromJournal of extracellular biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Iridoid Glycosides and Coumarin Glycoside Derivatives from the Roots ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marziyeh HajialyaniPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran, mh.farzaei@gmail.com.
Devesh TewariDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Technology, Kumaun University, Nainital, India.
Eduardo Sobarzo-SánchezLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Seyed Mohammad NabaviApplied Biotechnology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Hosein FarzaeiPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran, mh.farzaei@gmail.com.
Mohammad AbdollahiToxicologyand Diseases Group, The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS) and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, mohammad@tums.ac.ir.
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRBaqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRKumaun University · INTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing process is an intricate sequence of well-orchestrated biochemical and cellular phenomena to restore the integrity of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Several plant extracts and their phytoconstituents are known as a promising alternative for wound healing agents due to the presence of diverse active components, ease of access, and their limited side effects. The development of nanotechnological methods can help to improve the efficacy of different therapeutics as well as herbal-based products. Here, we present a review of the efficacy of the plant based-nanomaterials in the management of wounds and discuss the involved therapeutic targets. For this purpose, a profound search has been conducted on in vitro, in vivo, and/or clinical evidences evaluating the efficacy and pharmacological mechanisms of natural product-based nanostructures on different types of wounds. Different pharmacological targets are involved in the wound healing effects of herbal-based nanostructures, including suppressing the production of inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory transduction cascades, reducing oxidative factors and enhancing antioxidative enzymes, and promoting neovascularization and angiogenic pathways through increasing the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor. Moreover, nanostructure of plant extracts and their phytochemicals can enhance their bioavailability, control their release in the form of sustained delivery systems to the wound site, and enhance the permeability of these therapeutics to the underlying skin layers, which are all necessary for the healing process. Overall, various plant extracts and their natural compounds, used in nanoformulations, have demonstrated high activity in the management of wounds and thus can be assumed as future pharmaceutical drugs.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNanomedicineAnimalsBiological ProductsGreen Chemistry TechnologyHumansVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AWound HealingBiological ProductsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aelectrospinningherbal productshydrogelsmedicinal plantsnanoemulsionnanofibernanomedicinenanoparticlenanostructurenatural productphytochemicalswound dressingwound healing

Identifiers

PMID30214204
PMCPMC6128268
OpenAlexW2888861542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.