Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214155›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2018

Profile of pitolisant in the management of narcolepsy: design, development, and place in therapy.

Andrea Romigi, Giuseppe Vitrani, Temistocle Lo Giudice, Diego Centonze, Valentina Franco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Chemical Probes for Histamine Receptor Subtypes.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Characteristics of Cataplectic Attacks in Type 1 Narcolepsy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea RomigiIRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy, andrea.romigi@gmail.com.
Giuseppe VitraniIRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy, andrea.romigi@gmail.com.
Temistocle Lo GiudiceIRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy, andrea.romigi@gmail.com.
Diego CentonzeIRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy, andrea.romigi@gmail.com.
Valentina FrancoIRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITFoundation Center · USUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narcolepsy is a rare sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and rapid eye movement sleep dysregulation, manifesting as cataplexy and sleep paralysis, as well as hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations. Disease onset may occur at any age, although adolescents and young adults are mainly affected. Currently, the diagnosis delay ranges from 8 to 10 years and drug therapy may only attenuate symptoms. Pitolisant is a first-in-class new drug currently authorized by the European Medicines Agency to treat narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in adults and with an expanded evaluation for the treatment of neurologic diseases such as Parkinson's disease and epilepsy. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of pitolisant, highlighting its effectiveness and safety in patients with narcolepsy. We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We report on the efficacy and safety data of pitolisant in narcoleptic patients regarding cataplexy episodes and subjective and objective daytime sleepiness. The development program of pitolisant was characterized by eight Phase II/III studies. One proof-of-concept study followed by two pivotal studies, three randomized controlled trials, and two open studies were evaluated. Our review confirmed the effectiveness of pitolisant in treating major clinically relevant narcolepsy symptoms, including cataplexy, as compared to placebo. In addition, pitolisant revealed a safe profile when compared with placebo and active comparators. Headache, insomnia, and nausea were the prominent side effects. Further long-term randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of pitolisant with active comparators (ie, modafinil and sodium oxybate) may clarify its real place in therapy and its possible use as a first-line agent on the basis of its safety and tolerability.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansNarcolepsyPiperidinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPiperidinespitolisantcataplexyexcessive daytime sleepinesshistaminenarcolepsypitolisant

Identifiers

PMID30214155
PMCPMC6124464
OpenAlexW2888824810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.