Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214147›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Endophthalmitis rates among patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections: a USA claims analysis.

Szilárd Kiss, Pravin U Dugel, Arshad M Khanani, Michael S Broder, Eunice Chang, Gordon H Sun, Adam Turpcu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The ideal intravitreal injection setting: office, ambulatory surgery room or operating theatre? A narrative review and international survey.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Drug Distribution After Intravitreal Injection: A Mathematical Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Seven-year outcome after 1-year fixed regimen of intravitreal aflibercept injections followed by pro re nata treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Szilárd KissDepartment of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA, szk7001@med.cornell.edu.
Pravin U DugelRetinal Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Arshad M KhananiSierra Eye Associates, Reno, NV, USA.
Michael S BroderPartnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Eunice ChangPartnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Gordon H SunPartnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
Adam TurpcuGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Partnership for Health Analytic Research · USRetinal Consultants of Arizona · USSierra Eye Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntravitreal (IVT) injections of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab are commonly prescribed to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Studies comparing inflammation rates in large populations of patients receiving these agents and the treatment of ocular inflammation post-IVT anti-VEGF injections are scarce. In this study, we compared rates of endophthalmitis claims (sterile and infectious) following IVT anti-VEGF injections to determine the risk factors associated with developing endophthalmitis, and examined the claims for subsequent treatment. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study of USA claims data examined the risk of developing endophthalmitis following IVT injection of aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab in patients with nAMD between 11/18/2011 and 5/31/2013. The primary study outcome was occurrence of endophthalmitis within 30 days of a claim for an IVT anti-VEGF injection. Endophthalmitis rates were calculated separately for aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab, followed by pairwise comparisons of endophthalmitis frequencies among the 3 treatments.

resultsThis analysis included 818,558 injections from 156,594 patients with nAMD. The rates (% [n/N]) of endophthalmitis following aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab IVT injections were 0.100% (136/135,973), 0.056% (268/481,572), and 0.047% (94/201,013), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, aflibercept was associated with a significantly higher risk of endophthalmitis vs ranibizumab (adjusted odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI: 1.68-2.85;

conclusionThe rate of endophthalmitis was very low, but higher following IVT injection with aflibercept compared with both bevacizumab and ranibizumab in patients with nAMD.

Indexed as

afliberceptbevacizumabranibizumabregression analysis

Identifiers

PMID30214147
PMCPMC6124467
OpenAlexW2889412326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.