Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214144›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Selective laser trabeculoplasty vs micropulse laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma.

Benjamin Abramowitz, Nisha Chadha, Amr Kouchouk, Rashed Alhabshan, David A Belyea, Tania Lamba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and efficacy of laser trabeculoplasty compared to drug therapy for the management of open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Lasers in Glaucoma: an Overview.International ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Comparison of successful outcome predictors for MicroPulseClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019
    Article
  20. Micropulse laser trabeculoplasty and reduction of intraocular pressure: A preliminary study.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin AbramowitzGlaucoma Department, Eye Consultants of Northern Virginia, Springfield, VA, USA.
Nisha ChadhaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/New York Eye and Ear, Eye and Vision Research Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Amr KouchoukCornea Department, Atlantis Eyecare, Torrance, CA, USA.
Rashed AlhabshanDepartment of Ophthalmology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA, dbelyea@mfa.gwu.edu.
David A BelyeaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA, dbelyea@mfa.gwu.edu.
Tania LambaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA, dbelyea@mfa.gwu.edu.
George Washington University Hospital · USAssociated Eyecare · USNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary · USVirginia Eye Consultants · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to prospectively compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in open-angle glaucoma patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn all, 38 patients were randomized to 360° MLT and 31 patients were randomized to 360° SLT. IOP was measured at intervals of 1 hour and 1, 1-6, 6-12, 6-24, 24-36, and 36-52 weeks. Patients completed a survey 1 week after the procedure. Patients with end-stage, neovascular, uveitic, or angle-closure glaucoma were excluded. Treatment response was defined as an IOP reduction of ≥20.0% or ≥3 mmHg from baseline.

resultsIOP was lowered to ≥3 mmHg from baseline among 37.0% of the micropulse patients and 36.0% of patients in the selective laser group at 24-52 weeks. Similarly, 29.6% of the micropulse patients and 36.0% of the selective laser patients experienced a 20.0% IOP decrease from baseline during the 24-52-week interval (

conclusionMicropulse trabeculoplasty has demonstrated similar efficacy to SLT over a 52-week follow-up period with less discomfort experienced both during and after the procedure.

Indexed as

glaucomaintraocular pressuremicropulserandomized controlled trialselective laser trabeculoplasty

Identifiers

PMID30214144
PMCPMC6124459
OpenAlexW2889386207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.