ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2018
Comparison of twice a day and three times a day meropenem administration in elderly patients in a Japanese community hospital.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meropenem (MEPM) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribed to patients with moderate or severe pneumonia. It is well recognized that appropriate medicine reduces the burden on not only young patients but elderly ones as well. We enrolled 56 patients aged 75 and over who were diagnosed with moderate or severe pneumonia (body temperature: ≧37.5 °C; white blood cell (WBC) count: ≧10,000/μL; C-reactive protein (CRP): ≧4 mg/dL) on the basis of Clinical Evaluation Methods for New Antimicrobial Agents to Treat Respiratory Infections defined by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, at the National Hospital Organization Kanazawa Medical Center from January 1, 2007 to May 31, 2010. Forty-two patients were given MEPM twice a day and 14 were given the same drug three times a day in a Japanese community hospital. After four days, the three times a day group showed significant decreases in body temperature, WBC count, and CRP level, which are commonly used indices for evaluating therapeutic effects. Similarly, the twice a day group showed decreases of those indices, and both treatments had no serious adverse effects. Simulation analysis based on the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) theory revealed that both treatments effectively inhibited the activities of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.