Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30214034›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2019

Serum cholesterol and prostate cancer risk in the Finnish randomized study of screening for prostate cancer.

Teemu J Murtola, Tatu V J Kasurinen, Kirsi Talala, Kimmo Taari, Teuvo L J Tammela, Anssi Auvinen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Teemu J MurtolaFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. teemu.murtola@uta.fi.
Tatu V J KasurinenFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Kirsi TalalaFinnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.
Kimmo TaariDepartment of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Teuvo L J TammelaFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Anssi AuvinenFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FIFinnish Cancer Registry · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypercholesterolemia has been associated with advanced stage prostate cancer (PCa), but the role of lipid parameters such as HDL and triglycerides is unclear. We examined PCa risk by lipid parameters in a population nested within the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC).

methodsCholesterol measurements were available on 17,696 men. During the 17-year median follow-up, 2404 PCa cases were diagnosed. Cox regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for overall PCa risk and stratified by Gleason grade and tumor stage. We compared normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic men on four cholesterol parameters total cholesterol (TC), HDL, LDL, and triglycerides (TG), analyzed as time-dependent variables.

resultsTC in the highest tertile (above 5.1 mmol/l) and LDL above 3 mmol/l were associated with increased risk of Gleason 8-10 cancer (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.04-1.95 and HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.02-1.86, respectively). Further, overall PCa risk was elevated in the 3-year lag time analysis by TC in the highest two tertiles (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.54 for TC above 4.4 mmol/l, and HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05-1.51 for TC above 5.1 mmol/l) and HDL in the highest tertile (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08-1.64) and above 1 mmol/l (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.01-1.65). In contrast, TC in the highest tertile was associated with a decreased risk of PCa with 20-year lag time. The risk associations for overall PCa grew stronger with added lag time but were observed only in the FinRSPC control arm. Statin use did not modify the risk association.

conclusionsHypercholesterolemia may increase overall PCa risk in short-term, inverse risk association was observed with 20-years' time lag. Similar risk increase of overall PCa was also observed for elevated HDL, conflicting with previous findings on the subject.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCholesterolEarly Detection of CancerFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsProstatic NeoplasmsPublic Health SurveillanceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersCholesterol

Identifiers

PMID30214034
OpenAlexW2889866212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.