ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018
A
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Landscape ofBiology · 2026Review
- Highly frequent undesired insertional mutagenesis during Drosophila genome editing.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Embedded CRISPRi Enhances Gene-Silencing Efficiency in Drosophila.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- 20E-inducedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Retinoblastoma protein activity revealed by CRISPRi study of divergent Rbf1 and Rbf2 paralogs.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Tissue-specific knockout in the Drosophila neuromuscular system reveals ESCRT's role in formation of synapse-derived extracellular vesicles.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- tsCRISPR based identification of Rab proteins required for the recycling ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- An Adapted GeneSwitch Toolkit for Comparable Cellular and Animal Models: A Proof of Concept in Modeling Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Tissue-specific knockout inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Endoreplication in themicroPublication biology · 2023Article
- State-of-the-art CRISPR for in vivo and cell-based studies in Drosophila.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022Review
- Precise genome engineering inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- A versatile toolkit for CRISPR-Cas13-based RNA manipulation in Drosophila.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Glycogen branching enzyme controls cellular iron homeostasis via Iron Regulatory Protein 1 and mitoNEET.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Tissue-specific (ts)CRISPR as an efficient strategy for in vivo screening in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2019Article
- A fat-tissue sensor couples growth to oxygen availability by remotely controlling insulin secretion.Nature communications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeting gene function with spatial or temporal specificity is a key goal in molecular genetics. CRISPR-Cas9 has greatly facilitated this strategy, but some standard approaches are problematic. For instance, simple tissue-specific or global overexpression of Cas9 can cause significant lethality or developmental delays even in the absence of gRNAs. In particular, we found that Gal4-mediated expression of UAS-Cas9 in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.