ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Long Term Imaging Follow-Up.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- LI-RADS treatment response algorithm for detecting incomplete necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis using individual patient data.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Pooled it
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2026 expert consensus-based practical recommendation of the Korean Liver Cancer Association.Journal of liver cancer · 2026Article
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2026 expert consensus-based practical recommendation of the Korean Liver Cancer Association.Radiation oncology journal · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Arterial Phase Hyperenhancement After Proton Beam Therapy for Untreated Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of MRI-Based Treatment Response Assessment Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Comparative Analysis of mRECIST, LI-RADS TRA Version 2017, and LI-RADS Radiation TRA Version 2024.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Role of MRI in Imaging Assessment of Radiation-Based Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the LI-RADS radiation treatment response assessment v2024 in comparison with the modified RECIST.European radiology · 2025Article
- Can ADC changes help mRECIST or LI-RADS treatment response algorithm better diagnose pathological response of HCC after preoperative radiotherapy? Secondary analysis of a prospective phase 2 trial.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- The changes in imaging following proton beam therapy for pediatric hepatoblastoma.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- A magnetic resonance imaging radiomics approach predicts hepatocellular carcinoma response to stereotactic body radiation therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- The association between stage migration and overall survival after radiation-based therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Society of abdominal radiology survey of practice patterns in using LI-RADS treatment response criteria in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma post-locoregional treatment.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Is Cell-Free DNA Testing in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ready for Prime Time?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- Response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy: magnetic resonance imaging findings.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Early complete tumor response as a survival predictor in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Liver magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of response to treatment after stereotactic body radiation therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of hepatology · 2022Article
- MRI features of treated hepatocellular carcinoma following locoregional therapy: a pictorial review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the natural history of imaging findings seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although arterial hyperenhancement is a key feature of untreated HCC, our clinical experience suggested that tumors that never progressed could still show hyperenhancement. Therefore, we undertook a systematic study to test the hypothesis that persistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) after SBRT is an expected finding that does not suggest failure of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred forty-six patients undergoing SBRT for HCC between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, were screened retrospectively using an institutional review board-approved prospectively maintained registry. Inclusion criteria were (1) HCC treated with SBRT, (2) multiphasic MRI ≤3 months before SBRT, (3) up to 1 year of follow-up MRI post-SBRT, and (4) cirrhosis. The exclusion criterion was ≤3 months of locoregional therapy to the liver segment containing the SBRT-treated HCC. Pre- and post-SBRT MRI from up to 3 years were analyzed in consensus by independent pairs of subspecialty-trained radiologists to determine the temporal evolution of major features for HCC and imaging findings in off-target parenchyma.
resultsSixty-two patients with 67 HCCs (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network imaging criteria [OPTN] 5a [n = 26], OPTN 5b [n = 28], OPTN 5x [n = 7]; Liver Imaging Reporting Data System [LI-RAD]-M [n = 4] and LiRADs-4 [n = 2]) were studied. Tumor size either decreased (66% [44 of 67]) or remained unchanged (34% [23 of 67]) within the first 12 months. Post-SBRT APHE was common (58% [39 of 67]). When graded using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at 3 to 6 months, 25% (17 of 67) met criteria for complete response and 75% (50 of 67) met criteria for stable disease.
conclusionsSBRT is an effective locoregional treatment option for HCC. Persistent APHE is common and does not necessarily indicate viable neoplasm; thus, standard response assessment such as modified Response Evaluation Criteria should be used with caution, particularly in the early phases after SBRT therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.