Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30213751›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Long Term Imaging Follow-Up.

Mishal Mendiratta-Lala, William Masch, Prasad R Shankar, Holly E Hartman, Matthew S Davenport, Matthew J Schipper, Chris Maurino, Kyle C Cuneo, Theodore S Lawrence, Dawn Owen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Is Cell-Free DNA Testing in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ready for Prime Time?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mishal Mendiratta-LalaDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: mmendira@med.umich.edu.
William MaschDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Prasad R ShankarDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Holly E HartmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Matthew S DavenportDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Matthew J SchipperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Chris MaurinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kyle C CuneoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Theodore S LawrenceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Dawn OwenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
TREATMENT VERIFICATION AND TREATMENT PLAN REFINEMENTP01CA059827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KESSLER, MARC LEWIS, LAWRENCE, THEODORE S · 1993 to 2018
$37.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002241 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELLINGROD, VICKI L · 2017 to 2021
$6.9M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)KL2TR000434 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000434NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002241NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NCI NIH HHS P01 CA059827NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the natural history of imaging findings seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although arterial hyperenhancement is a key feature of untreated HCC, our clinical experience suggested that tumors that never progressed could still show hyperenhancement. Therefore, we undertook a systematic study to test the hypothesis that persistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) after SBRT is an expected finding that does not suggest failure of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred forty-six patients undergoing SBRT for HCC between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, were screened retrospectively using an institutional review board-approved prospectively maintained registry. Inclusion criteria were (1) HCC treated with SBRT, (2) multiphasic MRI ≤3 months before SBRT, (3) up to 1 year of follow-up MRI post-SBRT, and (4) cirrhosis. The exclusion criterion was ≤3 months of locoregional therapy to the liver segment containing the SBRT-treated HCC. Pre- and post-SBRT MRI from up to 3 years were analyzed in consensus by independent pairs of subspecialty-trained radiologists to determine the temporal evolution of major features for HCC and imaging findings in off-target parenchyma.

resultsSixty-two patients with 67 HCCs (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network imaging criteria [OPTN] 5a [n = 26], OPTN 5b [n = 28], OPTN 5x [n = 7]; Liver Imaging Reporting Data System [LI-RAD]-M [n = 4] and LiRADs-4 [n = 2]) were studied. Tumor size either decreased (66% [44 of 67]) or remained unchanged (34% [23 of 67]) within the first 12 months. Post-SBRT APHE was common (58% [39 of 67]). When graded using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at 3 to 6 months, 25% (17 of 67) met criteria for complete response and 75% (50 of 67) met criteria for stable disease.

conclusionsSBRT is an effective locoregional treatment option for HCC. Persistent APHE is common and does not necessarily indicate viable neoplasm; thus, standard response assessment such as modified Response Evaluation Criteria should be used with caution, particularly in the early phases after SBRT therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiosurgeryRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30213751
PMCPMC6301102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.