Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30213583›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2019

Clinical and Molecular Factors Associated With Histologic Response to Topical Steroid Treatment in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Swathi Eluri, Sara R Selitsky, Irina Perjar, Johnathan Hollyfield, Renee Betancourt, Cara Randall, Spencer Rusin, John T Woosley, Nicholas J Shaheen, Evan S Dellon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Heartburn and dyspepsia symptom severity improves after treatment and correlates with histology in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2019
    Trial
  4. Diffuse esophageal eosinophilia is associated with increased endoscopic severity and topical steroid non-response in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023
    Review
  13. Higher Body Mass Index Is Associated With Decreased Treatment Response to Topical Steroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Article
  14. Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  15. Eosinophilic esophagitis patients with multiple atopic conditions: Clinical characteristics and treatment response to topical steroids.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Pre-treatment differential correlation of gene expression and response to topical steroids in eosinophilic esophagitis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Older patients with eosinophilic esophagitis have high treatment response to topical steroids.Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swathi EluriCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Sara R SelitskyDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Irina PerjarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Johnathan HollyfieldDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Renee BetancourtDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Cara RandallDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Spencer RusinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
John T WoosleyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Nicholas J ShaheenCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Evan S DellonCenter for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: edellon@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
Non-Endoscopic Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus Following Ablative TherapyK24DK100548 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2013 to 2017
$896k
Risk Factors and Biomarkers for Diagnosis & Treatment of Eosinophilic EsophagitisK23DK090073 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DELLON, EVAN SAMUEL · 2011 to 2013
$541k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK090073NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK100548NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsFew factors have been identified that can be used to predict response of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) to topical steroid treatment. We aimed to determine whether baseline clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and molecular features of EoE can be used to predict histologic response.

methodsWe collected data from 97 patients with EoE, from 2009 through 2015, treated with a topical steroid for 8 weeks; 59 patients had a histologic response to treatment. Baseline clinicopathologic features and gene expression patterns were compared between patients with a histologic response to treatment (<15 eos/hpf) and non-responders (≥15 eos/hpf). We performed sensitivity analyses for alternative histologic response definitions. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors associated with response to therapy, which were assessed with area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curves.

resultsBaseline dilation was the only independent predictor of non-response (odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.89). When an alternate response (<1 eos/hpf) and non-response (<50% decrease in baseline eos/hpf) definition was used, independent predictors of response status were age (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14), food allergies (OR, 12.95; 95% CI, 2.20-76.15), baseline dilation (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.88), edema or decreased vascularity (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-1.03), and hiatal hernia (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.66). Using these 5 factors, we developed a predictive model that discriminated complete responders from non-responders with an AUROC of 0.88. Baseline gene expression patterns were not associated with treatment response and did not change with different histologic response thresholds.

conclusionsIn an analysis of 97 patients with EoE, we found dilation to be the only baseline factor associated with non-response to steroid treatment (<15 eos/hpf). However, a model comprising 5 clinical, endoscopic, and histologic factors identified patients with a complete response (<1 eos/hpf). A baseline gene expression panel was not predictive of treatment response at any threshold.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdultBiomarkersBiopsyBudesonideEosinophilic EsophagitisEsophagoscopyEsophagusFemaleFluticasoneFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersBudesonideFluticasoneGlucocorticoidsBiomarkerBudesonideFluticasonemRNA

Identifiers

PMID30213583
PMCPMC6409124
OpenAlexW2890214828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.