Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30213173›Full record

ArticleAsian spine journal2018

Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative Parecoxib Administration for Pain Control Following Major Spine Surgery.

Rayakorn Moonla, Adisorn Threetipayarak, Chininthon Panpaisarn, Nida Pattayaruk, Unchana Kaewkam, Nipawan Jumpalee, Jatupong Panwilai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian spine journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rayakorn MoonlaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chiangmai Neurological Hospital, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Adisorn ThreetipayarakDepartment of Pharmacy, Chiangmai Neurological Hospital, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Chininthon PanpaisarnDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chiangmai Neurological Hospital, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Nida PattayarukDepartment of Nurse Anesthesia, Chiangmai Neurological Hospital, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Unchana KaewkamDepartment of Nurse Anesthesia, Chiangmai Neurological Hospital, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Nipawan JumpaleeDepartment of Nurse Anesthesia, Chiangmai Neurological Hospital, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Jatupong PanwilaiDepartment of Nurse Anesthesia, Chiangmai Neurological Hospital, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital · TH

Funding

Ministry of Public Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designProspective randomized, double-blind controlled trial. PURPOSE: Here, we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of pain control between pre- and postoperative parecoxib administration in patients who have undergone major spine surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Several studies have compared the efficacy of pre- and postoperative administration of parecoxib, which led to inconclusive results owing to variation in operative time. Preincisional parecoxib administration reduces inflammatory response in major spine surgery requiring longer operative time; however, it may not reduce pain as much as parecoxib administration immediately after surgery would.

methodsTotally, 127 patients who underwent major spine surgery were randomly divided into three groups: pre-group, which received 40 mg parecoxib before skin incision and at 12 and 24 hours after the first dose; post-group, which received the same dose at wound closure and at 12 and 24 hours after the first dose; and control group, which did not receive any parecoxib. Efficacy and safety of parecoxib were measured based on pain score, morphine consumption, and side effects from both morphine and parecoxib at 24 hours after surgery.

resultsInitial postoperative pain score, postoperative pain score at rest, and accumulative morphine consumption at 24 hours after surgery were similar between the pre- and post-groups. Despite the significantly lower pain score and morphine consumption in both pre- and post-groups compared with the control group, cumulative morphine consumption at 24 hours after surgery was reduced by approximately 50% in the pre-group and 46% in the post-group compared. Analgesic-related complication incidence was similar in all groups.

conclusionsThe timing of parecoxib administration, either before or after major spinal surgery, did not affect the safety and analgesic efficacy of pain management.

Indexed as

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agentsOrthopedicsPain managementPostoperative painSpine

Identifiers

PMID30213173
PMCPMC6147878
OpenAlexW2890330379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.