Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30213014›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Effectiveness of 3-dimensional shoulder ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: A meta-analysis.

Aiping Teng, Fanxiao Liu, Dongsheng Zhou, Tao He, Yan Chevalier, Roland M Klar

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aiping TengDepartment of Ultrasonography, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Fanxiao Liu
Dongsheng Zhou
Tao He
Yan Chevalier
Roland M Klar
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEShandong Provincial Hospital · CNLMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous quantitatively based studies measuring the accuracy of 3D shoulder ultrasound (US) for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears remain inconclusive. In order to determine how effective 3D shoulder US is for detecting rotator cuff tears, a meta-analysis was performed systematically.

methodsSix electronic databases, PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP data, and Wanfang data, were utilized to retrieve articles praising the diagnostic value of 3D shoulder US for use in detecting rotator cuff tears. After screening and diluting out the articles that met inclusion criteria to be used for statistical analysis, the pooled evaluation indexes including sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) as well as the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were calculated utilizing Meta-Disc v.1.4.

resultsScreening determined that out of 4220, 7 studies involving a total of 282 patients were deemed viable for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The results of the analysis showed that the sensitivity and specificity were at 94% and 83%, respectively, with a DOR of 60.06, Q* index of 0.9058 and the area under SROC of 0.9609. Additionally, a satisfactory accuracy of 3D shoulder US was observed in detecting full- and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that 3D shoulder US is very effective and highly accurate to detect full-thickness rotator cuff tears, but may lack accuracy in the diagnosis of partial tears.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioROC CurveRotator Cuff InjuriesSensitivity and SpecificityShoulderUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30213014
PMCPMC6156036
OpenAlexW2892942593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.