Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30212538›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are exposed to more proton pump inhibitor (PPI)s compared to non-CKD patients.

Hee Jeong Lee, Haekyung Lee, Song Hee Oh, Joonbyung Park, Suyeon Park, Jin Seok Jeon, HyunJin Noh, Dong Cheol Han, Soon Hyo Kwon

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guidelines on optimizing the use of proton pump inhibitors: PPI stewardship.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hee Jeong LeeDepartment of Internal medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Haekyung LeeDepartment of Internal medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Song Hee OhDepartment of Internal medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Joonbyung ParkDepartment of Internal medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Suyeon ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Seok JeonDepartment of Internal medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
HyunJin NohDepartment of Internal medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Cheol HanDepartment of Internal medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Soon Hyo KwonDepartment of Internal medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4114-4196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton pump inhibitor use is associated with incident chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease progression and end-stage renal disease. However, the extent of proton pump inhibitor prescriptions to chronic kidney disease patients is still unclear.

methodIn a retrospective study, we enrolled patients (>18 years old) who received proton pump inhibitor in the out-patient setting from 2014 through 2015. All data was obtained from electronical medical records of Soonchunhyang Medical Center. The prescription patterns and characteristics of proton pump inhibitors were analyzed according to individual estimated glomerular filtration rate of the patients.

resultDuring the study period 178,228 patients visited the out-patient clinic. Proton pump inhibitors were prescribed to 9,109 (5.11%) patients. In our sample, 50% were females and 9.8% were chronic kidney disease (eGFR<60mL/min/1.73 m2) patients. Among the patients with chronic kidney disease, 730 (8.0%) were categorized as stage 3 or 4 and 166 (1.8%) were categorized as stage 5 or end-stage renal disease. The prevalence of proton pump inhibitors prescription among chronic kidney disease patients was higher than in the non-chronic kidney disease group (p<0.001). Median duration of usage was 120 [interquartile range 63-273] days in the stage 3-4 group, 106 [56-266] days in the stage 5-end-stage renal disease group and 90 [56-176] days in the non-chronic kidney disease group. Patients in stage 3-4 group were prescribed longer duration of proton pump inhibitors than the non-chronic kidney disease group even after adjusting for age and sex (p<0.001). The main departments of medicine which prescribed proton pump inhibitors for the stage 3-4 group were gastroenterology (40.0%), cardiology (29.6%), nephrology (9.5%) and neurology (4.8%). Compared to the non-chronic kidney disease group, the stage 3-4 and stage 5-end-stage renal disease group were taking larger number of drugs simultaneously (6.90±4.17 vs4.54±2.43; p<0.001, 5.64±2.87 vs 4.54±2.34; p<0.001, respectively).

conclusionChronic kidney disease patients are taking proton pump inhibitors for a much longer duration compared to non-chronic kidney disease patients. Physicians should pay careful attention when prescribing proton pump inhibitors to high risk groups.

Indexed as

AgedAmbulatory CareFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrevalenceProton Pump InhibitorsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30212538
PMCPMC6136773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.