In one paragraphArticle in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
6 authors.
Gregory S BarshHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0838-1042 Needhi BhallaDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6859-0073 Francesca ColeDepartment of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6391-2363 Gregory P CopenhaverDepartment of Biology and the Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7962-3862 Soni LacefieldDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2862-5067 Diana E LibudaDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-1814 Funding
Timing and regulation of meiotic commitment in S cerevisiaeR01GM105755 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Soni Lacefield · 2014 to 2026
$4.1MRecombination pathway and partner choices during meiosis - Admin supplement for purchase of a High Content Imaging System.R35GM128890 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Diana Elizabeth Libuda · 2018 to 2026
$4.0MThe Synapsis Checkpoint in C. elegans MeiosisR01GM097144 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI BHALLA, NEEDHI · 2011 to 2020
$2.8MMechanistic derivation of germ line mutation by genome-wide mouse tetrad analysisDP2HD087943 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI COLE, FRANCESCA · 2015 to 2015
$2.4MRecombination pathway and partner choice during C. elegans meiosisR00HD076165 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LIBUDA, DIANA ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2017
$719kNICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD087943NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD076165NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097144NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105755NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128890
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Awards and PrizesBiomedical ResearchAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsChromosome SegregationMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesPublishingSpindle ApparatusCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated Proteins
Identifiers
PMID30212501
PMCPMC6136686
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390