Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30212496›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Long-lasting insecticidal net use and asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia among household members of laboratory-confirmed malaria patients attending selected health facilities in Abuja, Nigeria, 2016: A cross-sectional survey.

Amaka Pamela Onyiah, IkeOluwapo O Ajayi, Hannah O Dada-Adegbola, Babatunde O Adedokun, Muhammad S Balogun, Patrick M Nguku, Olufemi O Ajumobi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Relationship between Duffy Genotype/Phenotype and Prevalence ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  9. Genetic diversity ofAfrican health sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amaka Pamela OnyiahNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-9502-5731
IkeOluwapo O AjayiNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Hannah O Dada-AdegbolaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Babatunde O AdedokunDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Muhammad S BalogunNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Patrick M NgukuNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Olufemi O AjumobiNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
University of Ibadan · NGAfrican Field Epidemiology Network · NG

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2G GH001876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn Nigeria, malaria remains a major burden. There is the presupposition that household members could have common exposure to malaria parasite and use of long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) could reduce transmission. This study was conducted to identify factors associated with asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia and LLIN use among households of confirmed malaria patients in Abuja, Nigeria.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to August 2016 in twelve health facilities selected from three area councils in Abuja, Nigeria. Participants were selected using multi-stage sampling technique. Overall, we recruited 602 participants from 107 households linked to 107 malaria patients attending the health facilities. Data on LLIN ownership, utilization, and house characteristics were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire. Blood samples of household members were examined for malaria parasitaemia using microscopy. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and logistic regression (α = 0.05).

resultsMedian age of respondents was 16.5 years (Interquartile range: 23 years); 55.0% were females. Proportions of households that owned and used at least one LLIN were 44.8% and 33.6%, respectively. Parasitaemia was detected in at least one family member of 102 (95.3%) index malaria patients. Prevalence of asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia among study participants was 421/602 (69.9%). No association was found between individual LLIN use and malaria parasitaemia (odds ratio: 0.9, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.6-1.3) among study participants. Having bushes around the homes was associated with having malaria parasitaemia (adjusted OR (aOR): 2.7, 95%CI: 1.7-4.2) and less use of LLIN (aOR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.2-0.9). Living in Kwali (aOR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.0-0.2) was associated with less use of LLIN.

conclusionHigh prevalence of asymptomatic malaria and low use of LLIN among household members of malaria patients portend the risk of intra-household common source of malaria transmission. We recommend household health education on LLIN use and environmental management. Study to explore the role of preventive treatment of household members of confirmed malaria patient in curbing transmission is suggested. Strategies promoting LLIN use need to be intensified in Kwali.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInsecticide-Treated BednetsLaboratoriesLogistic ModelsMalariaMaleNigeriaOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID30212496
PMCPMC6136754
OpenAlexW2891204906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.