ArticlePloS one2018
Whole genome sequencing of Neisseria meningitidis W isolates from the Czech Republic recovered in 1984-2017.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Invasive meningococcal disease in South-Eastern European countries: Do we need to revise vaccination strategies?Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Article
- Whole genome sequencing of Neisseria meningitidis Y isolates collected in the Czech Republic in 1993-2018.PloS one · 2022Article
- Phenotypic characterization ofAccess microbiology · 2020Article
- Genomic surveillance of invasive meningococcal disease in the Czech Republic, 2015-2017.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe study presents the analysis of whole genome sequence (WGS) data for Neisseria meningitidis serogroup W isolates recovered in the Czech Republic in 1984-2017 and their comparison with WGS data from other countries. MATERIAL AND
methodsThirty-one Czech N. meningitidis W isolates, 22 from invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) and nine from healthy carriers were analysed. The 33-year study period was divided into three periods: 1984-1999, 2000-2009, and 2010-2017.
resultsMost study isolates from IMD and healthy carriers were assigned to clonal complex cc22 (n = 10) in all study periods. The second leading clonal complex was cc865 (n = 8) presented by IMD (n = 7) and carriage (n = 1) isolates that emerged in the last study period, 2010-2017. The third clonal complex was cc11 (n = 4) including IMD isolates from the first (1984-1999) and third (2010-2017) study periods. The following clonal complex was cc174 (n = 3) presented by IMD isolates from the first two study periods, i.e. 1984-1999 and 2000-2009. One isolate of each cc41/44 and cc1136 originated from healthy carriers from the second study period, 2000-2009. The comparison of WGS data for N. meningitidis W isolates recovered in the Czech Republic in the study period 1984-2017 and for isolates from other countries recovered in the same period showed that clonal complex cc865, ST-3342 is unique to the Czech Republic since 2010. Moreover, the comparison shows that cc11 in the Czech Republic does not comprise novel hypervirulent lineages reported from both European and non-European countries. All 31 study isolates were assigned to Bexsero® Antigen Sequence Types (BAST), and seven of them were of newly described BASTs.
conclusionsWGS analysis contributed considerably to a more detailed molecular characterization of N. meningitidis W isolates recovered in the Czech Republic over a 33-year period and allowed for a spatial and temporal comparison of these characteristics between isolates from the Czech Republic and other countries. The most interesting finding of this study is that eight of 31 Czech isolates of N. meningitidis W belong to clonal complex cc865, which is uncommon for serogroup W. In addition, the WGS data precised the base for the update of the recommendation for vaccination in the Czech Republic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.