ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2019
Leukocyte Transcriptional Response in Sepsis.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The "Self-Sacrifice" of ImmuneCells in Sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Fluid Therapy in Dogs and Cats With Sepsis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- What's New in Shock, August 2019?Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe complex host response to sepsis is incompletely understood. The aim of this investigation is to use leukocyte RNA sequencing to characterize biological functions, cellular pathways, and key regulatory molecules driving sepsis pathophysiology.
methodsThis was a prospective, observational study of emergency department patients with sepsis, at an urban, academic, tertiary care center. In the derivation cohort, we collected blood at enrollment and 90 days after hospital discharge allowing each patient to serve as an internal control. We performed RNA sequencing to quantify transcriptional expression changes during sepsis and non-sepsis states. We then performed unsupervised and supervised analyses, as well as functional and pathway analyses. We selected the top down and upregulated genes and key regulatory molecules for validation. Validation occurred in a cohort of septic and non-septic using real-time PCR.
resultsThe derivation cohort included 5 patients, and RNA sequencing revealed 916 unique mRNA transcripts differentially expressed during sepsis. Among these, 673 (73%) genes were upregulated, and 243 (27%) were downregulated. Functional enrichment analysis revealed a highly dynamic downstream effect of the transcriptional activity during sepsis. Of the 43 functional cellular pathways activated during sepsis, the top pathways were closely associated with inflammation and response to infection. Validation occurred in 18 septic and 25 non-septic control patients, with 34/45 (76%) of identified genes validated. The regulatory analysis identified several key regulators of sepsis.
conclusionsHighly dynamic transcriptional activity occurs in leukocytes during sepsis, activating key cellular pathways and master regulatory molecules that drive the sepsis process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.