ArticleJournal of neural engineering2018
A neural mass model to predict electrical stimulation evoked responses in human and non-human primate brain.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deterministic, stochastic, and mean-field PDE models in neuroscience.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Evoked resonant neural activity long-term dynamics can be reproduced by a computational model with vesicle depletion.Neurobiology of disease · 2024Article
- Article
- Improved control effect of pathological oscillations by using delayed feedback stimulation in neural mass model with pedunculopontine nucleus.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Article
- Closed-loop enhancement and neural decoding of cognitive control in humans.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Development of Mechanistic Neural Mass (mNM) Models that Link Physiology to Mean-Field Dynamics.Frontiers in network physiology · 2022Article
- Toward biophysical markers of depression vulnerability.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- A model of metabolic supply-demand mismatch leading to secondary brain injury.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Modelling and prediction of the dynamic responses of large-scale brain networks during direct electrical stimulation.Nature biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Cholinergic Deep Brain Stimulation for Memory and Cognitive Disorders.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Review
- Deep brain stimulation of the internal capsule enhances human cognitive control and prefrontal cortex function.Nature communications · 2019Article
- The Virtual Brain links transcranial magnetic stimulation evoked potentials and inhibitory neurotransmitter changes in major depressive disorder.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
- Consistent linear and non-linear responses to invasive electrical brain stimulation across individuals and primate species with implanted electrodes.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is a valuable tool for ameliorating drug resistant pathologies such as movement disorders and epilepsy. DBS is also being considered for complex neuro-psychiatric disorders, which are characterized by high variability in symptoms and slow responses that hinder DBS setting optimization. The objective of this work was to develop an in silico platform to examine the effects of electrical stimulation in regions neighboring a stimulated brain region. APPROACH: We used the Jansen-Rit neural mass model of single and coupled nodes to simulate the response to a train of electrical current pulses at different frequencies (10-160 Hz) of the local field potential recorded in the amygdala and cortical structures in human subjects and a non-human primate.
resultsWe found that using a single node model, the evoked responses could be accurately modeled following a narrow range of stimulation frequencies. Including a second coupled node increased the range of stimulation frequencies whose evoked responses could be efficiently modeled. Furthermore, in a chronic recording from a non-human primate, features of the in vivo evoked response remained consistent for several weeks, suggesting that model re-parameterization for chronic stimulation protocols would be infrequent. SIGNIFICANCE: Using a model of neural population activity, we reproduced the evoked response to cortical and subcortical stimulation in human and non-human primate. This modeling framework provides an environment to explore, safely and rapidly, a wide range of stimulation settings not possible in human brain stimulation studies. The model can be trained on a limited dataset of stimulation responses to develop an optimal stimulation strategy for an individual patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.