ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2018
Impact on genitourinary function and quality of life following focal irreversible electroporation of different prostate segments.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Erectile function after focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review.International journal of impotence research · 2021Pooled it
- Targeted microwave ablation of localised prostate cancer (VIOLETTE trial): a prospective multicentre study.BJU international · 2026Trial
- Article
- Focal irreversible electroporation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Irreversible Electroporation for the Focal Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.The world journal of men's health · 2025Article
- Advances in irreversible electroporation for prostate cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Personalized Treatment Strategy in "Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Candidates" Using Irreversible Electroporation: Prospective Evaluation of Feasibility, Morbidity, Functional and Oncological Outcomes.The world journal of men's health · 2024Article
- Article
- Focal therapy for prostate cancer with irreversible electroporation: Oncological and functional results of a single institution study.Investigative and clinical urology · 2022Article
- Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following focal ablation with irreversible electroporation: feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes.BMC urology · 2022Article
- The SAFE Pilot Trial-SAlvage Focal Irreversible Electroporation-For Recurrent Localized Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Study Protocol.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Health-related quality of life in dogs treated with electrochemotherapy and/or interleukin-12 gene electrotransfer.Veterinary medicine and science · 2020Article
- Irreversible Electroporation: Background, Theory, and Review of Recent Developments in Clinical Oncology.Bioelectricity · 2019Review
- Irreversible Electroporation for the Ablation of Prostate Cancer.Current urology reports · 2019Review
- Irreversible electroporation as a focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to evaluate the genitourinary function and quality of life (QoL) following the ablation of different prostate segments with irreversible electroporation (IRE) for localized prostate cancer (PCa).
methodsSixty patients who received primary focal IRE for organ-confined PCa were recruited for this study. Patients were evaluated for genitourinary function and QoL per prostate segment treated (anterior vs. posterior, apex vs. base vs. apex-to-base, unilateral vs. bilateral). IRE system settings and patient characteristics were compared between patients with preserved vs. those with impaired erectile function and urinary continence. Data were prospectively collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months using the expanded prostate cancer index composite, American Urological Association symptom score, SF-12 physical and mental component summary surveys. Difference over time within segments per questionnaire was evaluated using the Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Outcome differences between segments were assessed using covariance models. Baseline measurements included questionnaire scores, age, and prostate volume.
resultsThere were no statistically significant changes over time for overall urinary (P = 0.07-0.89), bowel (P = 0.06-0.79), physical (P = 0.18-0.71) and mental (P = 0.45-0.94) QoL scores within each segment. Deterioration of sexual function scores was observed at 6 months within each segment (P = 0.001-0.16). There were no statistically significant differences in QoL scores between prostate segments (P = 0.08-0.97). Older patients or those with poor baseline sexual function at time of treatment were associated with a greater risk of developing erectile dysfunction.
conclusionIRE is a feasible modality for all prostate segments without any significantly different effect on the QoL outcomes. Older patients and those with poor sexual function need to be counseled regarding the risk of erectile dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.