Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30211677›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2018

Imaging features of bile duct adenoma: case series and review of literature.

Jeffrey A Chuy, Ishan Garg, Rondell P Graham, Wendaline M VanBuren, Sudhakar K Venkatesh

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Early detection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Japanese journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey A ChuyDepartment of Radiology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ishan GargDepartment of Radiology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rondell P GrahamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Wendaline M VanBurenDepartment of Radiology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sudhakar K VenkateshDepartment of Radiology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to evaluate the imaging features of bile duct adenoma (BDA) on ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsRetrospective search in our institution database was performed for histologically confirmed BDA. Their imaging studies before histologic confirmation were reviewed. The search identified seven adults (mean age, 52.9 years) with histologically proven single BDA each. US (n=3), CT (n=5), and MRI (n=3) were performed before histologic confirmation. Additionally, a systematic English literature review for BDA and reported imaging findings since 2000 was also conducted using the following search criteria "bile duct adenoma, peribiliary hamartoma, biliary adenoma, CT, ultrasound, MRI" (date range: 01/01/2000 through 08/31/2016). The imaging findings of those cases reported were summarized and compared with our series.

resultsAll seven individual nodules were well circumscribed. Five lesions were located in the right hepatic lobe and two in the left hepatic lobe. On US, lesions appeared hypoechoic (n=2) and hyperechoic (n=1). BDA was hypodense on unenhanced CT images (n=1). On MRI, BDA were hypointense on T1 (n=3), hyperintense on T2 (n=3), and hyperintense on diffusion-weighted images (n=2). On contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, BDAs showed arterial phase hyperenhancement that persisted on portal venous/delayed phase images.

conclusionBDA demonstrates characteristic arterial phase hyperenhancement that persisted into the portal venous and delayed phases on CT and MRI, which may be useful in differentiating from other hepatic lesions.

Indexed as

Adenoma, Bile DuctAdultAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30211677
PMCPMC6135054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.