ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2018
Readability of Sports Injury and Prevention Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Website.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation and Comparison of Large Language Model Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Quality and Readability Assessment Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving Patient Understanding of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Three-Dimensional Models.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024Article
- Readability and quality levels of websites that contain written information about anterior cruciate ligament injury: A survey of Turkish websites.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2022Article
- Readability assessment of patient educational materials for shoulder arthroplasty from top academic orthopedic institutions.JSES international · 2022Article
- Readability levels and thematic content analysis of online and printed lead poisoning informational materials.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Value-based Healthcare: Health Literacy's Impact on Orthopaedic Care Delivery and Community Viability.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020Article
- Online resources for platelet-rich plasma injections for orthopedic therapy: What are patients reading? A survey of Turkish websites.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the readability of 114 Sports Injury and Prevention patient education materials provided by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).
methodsWe evaluated all articles written in English posted under the Sports Injury and Prevention section of the AAOS website using readability software to compute six readability scores, which we compared with the eighth-grade level using a two-tailed one-sample Student
resultsThe mean reading grade level calculated by each readability test was markedly higher than the eighth-grade level. We reported mean ± SD for each test: Flesch-Kincaid grade level (8.95 ± 1.51; DISCUSSION: This study shows that patient education materials provided by the AAOS concerning sports injury and prevention are written at a readability level too high for patients to understand. On average, patient materials are written at least 2.5 grade levels higher than national recommendations. Only 7% of the 114 articles had readability scores in line with national recommendations. These findings indicate a need for revised patient education materials geared toward bringing the readability level down to the recommended eighth-grade level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.