Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30211179›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2018

Hypertension genomics and cardiovascular prevention.

Fu Liang Ng, Helen R Warren, Mark J Caulfield

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Sodium-not harmful?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fu Liang NgWilliam Harvey Research Institute, The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
Helen R WarrenWilliam Harvey Research Institute, The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
Mark J CaulfieldWilliam Harvey Research Institute, The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
St Bartholomew's Hospital · GBWilliam Harvey Research Institute · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/12/82/29736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension continues to be a major risk factor for global mortality, and recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have expanded in size, leading to the identification of further genetic loci influencing blood pressure. In light of the new knowledge from the largest cardiovascular GWAS to date, we review the potential impact of genomics on discovering potential drug targets, risk stratification with genetic risk scores, drug selection with pharmacogenetics, and exploring insights provided by gene-environment interactions.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasegene-environmentgeneticsHypertensionpharmacogeneticsrisk score

Identifiers

PMID30211179
PMCPMC6123211
OpenAlexW2810092012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.