ReviewFrontiers in oncology2018
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Destabilizing the genome as a therapeutic strategy to enhance response to immune checkpoint blockade: a systematic review of clinical trials evidence from solid and hematological tumors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Circulating Tumour Cell Expression of Immune Markers as Prognostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Pooled it
- Afatinib versus methotrexate as second-line treatment in Asian patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum-based therapy (LUX-Head & Neck 3): an open-label, randomised phase III trial.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2019Trial
- Prognostic Impact and Clinicopathological Significance of TIM-3 and LAG-3 Expressions in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- LILRB1 Is a Prognostic-Related Biomarker Correlated With Immune Infiltration in Head-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Divergent immuno-landscapes: comparing the tumor microenvironment of Indian and Western HNSCC patients.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The biological characteristics of tertiary lymphoid structures in head and neck cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Characterizing the Head and Neck Cancer Microenvironment: Implications for Immunotherapy and Prognosis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Dysregulated miRNA Expression and Its Association with Immune Checkpoints in Head and Neck Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Odontogenic carcinosarcoma: a comprehensive review of clinical and therapeutic insights.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
- FCGBP functions as a tumor suppressor gene in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- The expression of immune checkpoint proteins PD-L1 and TIM3 in mouse and human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.European journal of oral sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Interleukin-6 serves as a critical factor in various cancer progression and therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- Mechanisms of Resistance and Therapeutic Perspectives in Immunotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancers.Cancers · 2024Review
- Trends and Patterns in Mandible Bone Cancer Research: An Updated Comprehensive Bibliometric Review : Prevalence of Supernumerary Teeth in Patients with Cleft lip and Palate.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
- Understanding immune checkpoints and PD-1/PD-L1-mediated immune resistance towards tumour immunotherapy.3 Biotech · 2023Review
- Identify and validate circadian regulators as potential prognostic markers and immune infiltrates in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is the 6th most common cancer globally and commonly presents with locally advanced disease, which has a recurrence rate of around 50% despite aggressive multi-modality treatment involving surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy or EGFR inhibition where appropriate. As understanding of the underlying cancer biology and the complex interactions within the tumor microenvironment improves, there is gathering interest in and evidence for the role of immunomodulating agents in the management of HNSCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which aim to hinder the inhibitory interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1, have demonstrated durable improvements in patient outcomes in advanced / metastatic HNSCC, with both pembrolizumab and nivolumab being granted FDA approval in 2016. There are numerous ongoing clinical trials exploring the role of checkpoint inhibitors both as single agents and in combination, administered with established treatment modalities such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as alongside other novel immune modulators. These trials are not limited to advanced / metastatic HNSCC, but also to the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant settings. As studies complete and more results become available, the role immunotherapy agents will have within the treatment strategies for HNSCC may change, with increasing biomarker selection resulting in personalized therapy aiming to further improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.